I think they just don’t realize they need to give two shits yet 

 Politicians don't work for voters. 

Never have. 

 Voters messed up by not participating in civic activities. I could argue that many are unable to do so because:

1. big wealth dumbing down USA populous.

Anyway … again …

WWII sent off boys from the farm. 
Lucky men came home 
Many were heartbroken 
Fractured souls & altered minds
Attempted to claim their peace 
Of the American dream
Honoring their fallen friends & respect 
Back to school they went
Educated now birthed the middle class

But wait! Political interests 
Quickly engaged by the bags of money 
Force fed by marketing 
They can’t take **our** money 
Peasants can’t hold status 
Wealthy lived in privilege 
They didn’t want only their income
Sought to destroy others 
How to do so they asked? 
Nixon

     Reagan- Nom- Icks 
Manipulating others to hate Ebonics 
     Dose them with sugar water 
anti-union laws pushed 
     The poor are lesser humans 
Take away their pensions 
      Less educated masses 
Wealth force-fed the regulations 
      Dumb, deaf or blind 🇺🇸 stayed 
Going to church on Sunday 
    And more loose taxes for the power 
But God only knows the hour 😂
     Hypocrisy!!!

USA unaware of 
Evil pulling the strings. 
Peacemakers spoke 
As always 
Powerfully silenced. 

Then the - isms
Keep the pawns fighting amongst theirselves 
Religion, class, race and sex
Divided caste chattel is US society
We’ve bought into “freedom” ideology 
“Let them eat fast food.”
We ignore or berate those unlike us. 
This keeps us constantly wrestling 

 💩💩 

 I had to come to terms with the realization that the Democratic Party and the whole establishment are completely corrupt. And that none of the things they said about trump were true. 
But after all that is seen, there are still some glaring character flaws in Trump that are concerning. Blind spots being my chief concern 

 
Yes, exactly. 
Blind spots and a susceptibility to flattery and recognition. 

Who knows what actually happened, but I can totally imagine Jamie Dimon saying something positive about Trump and that being enough. "He's a good guy, one of the best. So smart, so smart." And just like that, one of the worst of the establishment becomes Secty of the Treasury. 

 I feel my decade long foray into caring deeply about politics waning. I want to see some serious crimes be paid for, some houses on fire, and remorse in some eyes. 
Beyond that, I’m getting into writings from times of transition. Post fall of Rome, thinkers like Isidore of Seville, what enabled the renaissance…
And how to live a sovereign life.
There is something soul bleeding about too much political. 

 Bitcoin is outlaw money of the base of the pyramid up…government policy toward Bitcoin is only marginally relevant. We only worry about it here because we’ve all had the cosmic luxury of never or very rather being in situations requiring using tools outside of the system 

 Also, I focus on orange pilling individual democrats / leftists / whatever label you want call it. Breaking through climate hypocrisy is easy - if someone is truly concerned about climate they can be lead to bitcoin in relatively short order. 

However if they have accepted the death cult of anti-natalism, anti-civilizationism, nihilism, and 2+2=5 anti-truth, you probably cannot help them. They will ultimately have to free themselves. And not everyone will make it and that’s ok… 

 You talking about Dems or GOP? Bc they both trying in different ways lol

Anyway. I know dog. I genuinely believe bitcoin will win either way. 

 False equivalency. It’s dems that are the problem currently. It hasn’t been the gop for 20 years. They’re feckless. 

 When I talk to progressives/the left in life they think the GOP are destroying the world, their lives, and risking democracy

When I talk to the right, the opposite. 

I think it’s an issue by issue conversation, and also depending on personal beliefs and politics. At some point it’s also a lot of agree to disagree. 

There has not been unilateral dem control like that. Depends on context - branch of govt, state or federal, judges, issue, etc. 

 People also exist in their echo chambers and love to see even small bits of information that supports their already formed views. True objective conversation on the matter is incredibly difficult because the “thought leaders” would never budge 

 Only one of these things is true. You can both sides it all you want, but it doesn’t make it accurate. 

 Of the five or six levers of power that control how the world works, there hasn't been a right wing hand on any of them in the western world since FDR first took the oath of office. 

 I can only give you my thought process and thinking in hopes this just may  ignite or renewed a spark in you.

First I think, it's their game plan to make us feel the system is broken so we just give up and they win.  Well, actually they have already won but I feel it's my duty to peacefully attempt to reverse the current  extreme governmental overreach.

Two things happen recently that has gotten me off the sidelines.   The handling of COVID and losing my job because I refused the JAB.  Now my attitude is get off my ass and try to make a difference. 

The thing that attracts me to RFK  is he has demonstrated to me he has integrity.  I don't agree fully with his stance on Israel either because I think Israel knew the attack was coming and let it happen so they could justify their current responses.  They were taking a page out of  war mongering  handbook.

My sense of duty is inspired from this text in the Declaration of Independence.

"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government"

I would replace Men with People so it's gender neutral.  I would also change the last phrase to: 'Right of the People' to 'Duty of the People'.

If my only choice was one of theuniparty candidates, I would likely vote for Trump or simply not vote and join the civil war movement.

What ever you choose to do, I hope you always strive to make a better place for the generations to come. 

 Thank you for such a thoughtful response! I found the covid handling so appalling that I left a good life to start from scratch on raw land. Much of what my husband I do here - permaculture, community, work choices - is geared toward making this world, or at least our corner of the world, better for future generations. So I'm with you fully on that. I've also come to believe that there are areas in which we do have power to reverse the current extreme governmental overreach: in the communities we build, the systems we support, the money we use. 

What I'm not sure of is whether voting is one of those.

If I had to choose it would be RFK, probably mostly because of his intelligence and personal integrity. This is how I see it: DNC choice will happily sell us out to the highest bidder, Trump can be manipulated into doing so, and RFK might actually put up a fight before conceding. I do wonder if his stance on Israel is an example of him conceding.

In 2020 I held my nose and voted for Biden, thinking him the lesser of two evils (ha!) and also betting that once Dems were in charge maybe they would calm down about covid (haha!!!). I was so wrong, and I regret my vote. I don't think it would have been much better to vote for Trump, so I am inclined to think that it would have been better to just not participate.

In any case, I appreciate your note and may re-read it before November.

Good for you for refusing the jab even at the expense of your job 🤩.  I hope that a new set of options has opened for you.

Take care- 

 This video may help everyone see what we are up against and provide some insights on how rise above it.

https://rumble.com/embed/v2sab20/?pub=m6fb1 

 WTAF are you talking about? I’m not bigot nor a racist. 

 "99% of humanity is being systematically separated & destroyed by the top 1%."

"But FFS 🤦🏻‍♀️ I beg people to look into lobbyists & how they write laws. How the past 50 years has changed the USA. Who & why pushed it?"

Those statements are 100% antisemitic. 

 You’re wrong. Do more research. Hint: go to England & look at the monarchy. 

 You mean The City of London? Not London the city, but the one square mile that is not subject to ANY British or EU or UN regulation. King Charles (or any British official) isn't permitted to step foot in it's boundaries without a personal invitation.

Quigley danced around the issue in Tragedy and Hope because he didn't want to end up dead. 

 OH, I see what you did. You conflated two of my sentences to push your own narrative. Nice try. 🤣 

 I wish you were right. Some day you'll notice it. Either way, I wish the best for you. 

 99% of humanity are slaves to the top 1% 

 You really need me to put EVERY caveat 

: this excludes anyone who is doing good & charitable work with their enormous wealth. Shall we then exclude the humanity who are comfortable ignoring that almost anyone in the USA is in the top 1% of the world … I mean … make your argument or keep your mouth shut. 

Your assumptions have no basis in reality. 

 Usury is the weapon that funnels resources from the many to the few.

Often, it is a direct weapon, but even when it isn't, it funds all the others. 

 Now you switch. You can’t make your initial argument so you divert. You’ve made it plain to me you are a bad actor. Muting you now bye ✌️ 

 If you can't see that as the exact same argument, then good luck. 

 Yes it is. Bring it on motherfuckers. 

 Another scenario, some of them own bitcoin so they will be incentivised to ne softer. 

Game theory will play out 

 It's 100% of Demorats

It's 60% of Republicans on thé national stage. 

10% of republicans on the local and state stage. 

The enemy are communists and they are the Democrats

Some republicans in name only are also commies like Lindsay Graham and Nikki Haley.  

 That's pretty close. They aren't really commies though. Except for a few eggheads, nobody has believed that for over 75 years. What they really are is progressives. Dig into some elite theory. 

 Commies are simply evil people that are looking to decides for other people lives. 

Progressives is a rebrand for communists 

 You're not wrong to think of them in those terms.

If you want to define things like that, go ahead, but the original definitions are useful.

Precise language gives us a better understanding of what we're up against.


 

 Well exactly, when you call them progressives and think they are different from commies, you are playing exactly into their propaganda to make people believe that they are 'not' communist psycopaths 

 Progressivism is every bit as totalitarian and destructive as communism, but is a distinct ideology that allows the adherents a more believable false claim of having the moral high ground.

Both were offshoots of the revolutionary spirit unleashed in France in 1789. 

 Yes they don't get bitcoin. 

When bitcoin wins, bribing the NPCs with free stuff will not be possible. 

Bye Welfare
Bye Social Security 
Bye Medicare 
Bye green new scam

They don't get bit coin or they are not progressive. 

Can't have both