VC funded clients like @miljan are absolutely necessary, and are the proven, track record option to find an avenue to healthy, sustainable business. Miljan and team are making huge strides across all platformd. This is required for a healthy nostr ecosystem that eventually hopes to beat Wef-chat/twtr at nostr’s game. 

The potential of @OpenSats to fund *exploration* of a non-VC path of a thus far well received client in Damus cannot be understated. 

I am grateful for funding for Damus thus far, and genuinely want to understand - why stop funding an extremely lean, extremely productive project now? 

 I agree with this, team Primal/Damus/Whatever ftw 

 🥱 

 I AGREE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE WHICH IS WHY WE ARE CURRENTLY FUNDING DAMUS AND MANY OTHER CLIENTS.

WILL HAS MY DIRECT CONTACT INFO AND NEVER REACHED OUT. WHY? 

 DMs 

 We have reached out by email months ago, we never got a response. 

 Sent another one a couple hours ago, I think there just needs to be some clarification because there has been lots of confusion around the whole process. 

 This corner of the world can be leveraged to soften risk of necessary future exclusionism, hard passes, boundary setting, and other forks.

Love 

 I suppose I should:

@OpenSats I am wondering how your board remains unbiased when deciding which projects to fund, when your board members vc fund competing clients?

Do you plan on continuing to fund @damus ?