Oddbean new post about | logout
 @Seth For Privacy
Which one do we not like again?

 https://i.nostr.build/eZlG4.jpg 
 
 Also, what is a likely higher-order effect of regularly sending text-strings which represent monetary value:
[ ] more focus on encrypted and private communication
[ ] less focus on encrypted and private communication 
 Good morning.
We like the nuts.

nostr:nevent1qqsq3mh4zvz08q63kr8nrndq2s7hcfdvlk7qc24f98rr9agzgvde27qpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcpzp57hgyjdm76mm3sm3uvdzlpnxkamf7x8zxp2xhhzwv22fxjwk7caqvzqqqqqqyk6peqg 
 Hey look a table that forces you to pick the lesser evil, so convincing 
 Want to get nuanced? 
 No need to waste both of our times, I'm familiar with in-depth arguments.

Let me just say this: I'm all for existing custodians to turn to ecash mints. That's not what is happening and it's also unlikely to ever happen.

So no, ecash won't replace existing custodians. 
 only an outlet to earn cash
🤫 
 Tap on. Tap in. Tap out. 
 Such classic slogans


Then there is math that maths to taunt 
 Why won’t it? 
 Lack of incentives 
 Standards don’t need motivation to be true. 
 Not a lobby 
 M
O
N
E
R
O
 
 up next from Tony:  "Well-built houses that will shelter your family for decades are all valueless because they trend to zero in bitcoin terms. How is there any utility in an asset that doesn't 10x in price every 5 years?" 
 Monero:

✅ Not an IOU

✅ Open and decentralized issuance (No seigniorage)

✅ Issuance requires PoW (Not arbitrarily rehypothecatable)

✅ Issuance is stable and predictable

✅ Your tokens don't instantly become useless and worthless when a mint shuts down (0 in bitcoin terms)

Ecash is cool, but let's not pretend it has no major downsides, or that Monero doesn't have it's own perks. 
 wut?