Pablo's idea of "no source of truth" is really interesting. nostr:nevent1qqsf0jy5v2sm6s0lu72l4t3jyqfsr87jk0x6e5ge09qxghh5j3p205gppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5pzq3svyhng9ld8sv44950j957j9vchdktj7cxumsep9mvvjthc2pjuqvzqqqqqqyqudng0
I would challenge that it was not his idea. He implemented it in a certain way. Let's see where this can go. For a start, it probably would be helpful to copy Wikipedia - as bad as many find it in some details. There is no reason to start a wikifreedia from scratch. https://wikifreedia.xyz/money
Agree with the first part, as would Twain. Disagree with the second. Plenty of reasons to start these things. Experimentation and exploration, to just name two. https://image.nostr.build/329743881204af5c91451403298b50729ab1e6c935e1d2504e76546e9689a71c.jpg
If there's no such thing as a new idea where did the first idea come from? Turtles all the way down Mr. Twain is it!? Haha what a retard. You could apply the same argument to biological evolution, each new species is just a remix of the old. Yet somehow they magically improve and most stuff alive today does not look like an amoeba. All original information, whether it's genes or memes, comes from the quantum field of the universe. Seth Lloyd explains it very nicely in his book "Programming the Universe". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_the_Universe
nostr:naddr1qqdxsmmh23h5xmmwwdhkc6tyv96x2nr0den5vmmjd4zkuq3qgm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexsxpqqqp65wg2apxr
What do I do with this? This doesn't display correctly for me. https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_2668061593869239361708798819.webp
I don't argue to not start this project on nostr at all but the data ... Wikipedia is a giant treasure trove of indisputably valuable content that I bet will get copied in by some bot at some point anyway, just to pre-fill the pedia with something to grow from. Why re-invent all that content?
GP: Is Eris true? M2: Everything is true. GP: Even false things? M2: Even false things are true. GP: How can that be? M2: I don't know man, I didn't do it. https://www.principiadiscordia.com/book/6.php
Relativism? Feet planted firmly mid-air?
idk if you have been noticing that this "source of truth" expression has been popping up everywhere on the internet in tech and dev circles, like, i saw it on the Netbox readme it's not that there is no truth that there is no HUMAN CONTROLLED source of truth bitcoin comes close to being a source of truth about itself because it's basically impossible to alter the record, everything else is an opinion axioms are also decentralised, they don't need an authority either, you simply can't refute them without contradicting yourself "source of truth" is just a new spook synonym for authority