Oddbean

Appreciate you laying it out. But I don’t think what you laid out is a viable pathway to something large or significant. If nostr is going to be some minor little network where a few people congregate to avoid ads and just chat to each other - sure. I see value in that. But that won’t change the web or make any meaningful impact in the world. The future is content creation, and that means more and more content creators and a larger and larger creator economy. (Yep…more influencers). Sure - 80% of them are cringe, but 20% are excellent educators and there is loads to learn. (Maybe it’s 90/10, or 99/1 ). The web is going to become the future of education. And that means content creators, selling stuff, and that also means ads. Will Nostr play that game ? Or will it remain small and fringe ?

thanks, i get what you mean about significance and changing the web. i’m in that too. not just here - my company is pushing to transform the commercial real estate industry towards full information transparency. it’s a hard task, but that’s the fun part in the end. ambitions should be high, but timing (is the market ready for my solution?) and strategy (start small, dominate, then expand) matter too. the result of these two factors is pragmatic tactics that let you keep moving forward, day by day, step by step. about ads: > selling stuff, and that also means ads if it comes to that, i’ll just start my own client 🙃 and that freedom is exactly what i love about nostr! but… i think we’re underestimating the potential impact of value-for-value. @jb55 created something incredible with zaps; you won’t find that anywhere else. still looking with a fresh outsider's eye, i think vfv is a big opportunity that could lay the foundation for a new, humble, and healthy creator’s economy. in my mind, it’s an ads-free model (of course!) where clients can earn fees (like patreon, substack) and, instead of disrupting MY feed with THEIR paid content, they invest in new mechanisms to discover worthy things. and as i see these ideas are already popping up in discussions.

the problem with commercial real estate data is that it's fragmented (many players, each aggregating the same/similar information for their own purposes). as a result, there's at least a double cost - one to collect the data, and one to verify it, multiplied by the number of players. this leads to many implications, including information gray areas and institutional players exploiting insider insights. today, our platform solves the problem of data collection (we act as an integrator), but the missing puzzle is verification. a few years ago, I was working on the idea of "property digital passports" - we built a theoretical model, the idea that each property could have its nft-like token with its history records chained in it (so there shouldn't be a need to double verify information that has been confirmed in the past). didn't develop it further because we needed to put more effort into the core business, but... when I came across nostr, I was very excited because the concept is very close to what we were looking for. to answer your question if we will use nostr, i still need to learn more and understand it better, but I'm very optimistic.

Pablo has a really good angle on this with how he intends to build @Highlighter I think that approach is infinitely more compelling than V4V. I personally don’t think V4V scales. That’s why busking is not really a viable commercial strategy for 99% of the market. Either way - this community needs more minds like yours around. PS: You should also connect with @Tanja and give her some feedback on her new initiative.