Oddbean new post about | logout
 If Trump really does impose broad and high tariffs then it’ll cause domestic inflation. What will it due the USD visa vi other currencies? Will it cause inflation elsewhere? 
 The system has many levers. Trying to predict the outcome of one variable, if somebody tells you the result is clearly x they are lying to you  
 Does he plan to impose them, or is he putting countries on notice that he plans to make some changes?  
 They would have to stimulate domestic economy to produce the goods within the USA themselves in order to void that.  Isn't it the plan actually ? 
 The US doesn't export anything except entertainment and weapons so just those two things  
 Are you serious or just shitposting?

The US exported more oil (light, sweet crude) last year than ever before. 
 US screwed up EU-RUS relationship,  they even blew up the Nord stream just in case EU doesn't kneels to cheaper Russian natural gas again. 

Now we need to import many times more expensive natural gas from the US.

And they are trying really hard to brake us with China also.
....

Here you have presentation of US export  https://www.visualcapitalist.com/us-goods-exports-by-state/ 
 I have heard many people repeating the line "government had more money than it knew what to do with" as if that is a great thing. It isn't. Government should have just enough money given voluntarily by the governed. You won't remain free for very long if your government has the right to take or make money. That especially includes tariffs, as it essentially dictates what Americans can/can't buy from outside of their borders. It's a blank check for central planners to pick and choose economic winners.

All government funding should be voluntarily without use of force. Tariffs are force.  
 Tariffs are a short term lever for rebalancing the ability of your nation’s manufacturing sectors and skilled labor to produce both peacetime and wartime goods. We shortsightedly exported the jobs that kept our population’s skills polished. We need to rebalance that or we will eventually have to face that we exported our nations ability to defend itself against foreign forces, both physical and financial through monetary trade and mass production of supplies. It’s not a tax on its own citizens. It is meant to relocalize long term sources of prosperity, like localized mass production, community and regional self reliance, diverse skill set development across our population, etc.  
 You say 'we' and 'our' like individual property rights don't exist. That isn't consistent with American ideals. Companies should be free to come and go without government using any 'lever' to try and control economics. All they really need to do is fuck off and companies probably wouldn't want to leave. Using force always breaks something in an economy, even if you have the perception of fixing something else. Laissez-faire is the only rational policy and it's also the only policy consistent with freedom. Americans and companies can fix everything on their own by having government just fuck off entirely. Do nothing except remove all the somethings that broke everything.  
 Makes sense. I’m over here munching popcorn while watching the political happenings right now as I’m reading about how civilizations have tried throughout the ages to offer both freedom and longevity. I don’t have an answer for us, obviously. Stepping way back is what affords the perspective I put forward. I prefer a free market. I’m guessing that if something good comes from what’s happening, I think it falls in line with what I laid out. The cost of someone grabbing the steering wheel at the top of a nation of free people, is that it sucks when it messes with their individual freedoms and goals. 
 If the government had more money than it knew what to do with, we wouldn't be running Trillion dollar deficits. Our current monetary foundation is based on debt, because we can always go more into debt tomorrow to pay the debts of today.  Until we can't. Bitcoin changes that entire foundation and flips it over.  The more debt you have, the weaker you are.

Thomas Paine didn't have as good of an understanding of economics as Alexander Hamilton did, but he did understand politics.  The people institute governments in order to manage infrastructure that is beyond the ability of individuals or companies.  Governments may have been corrupted over the last 250 years, but that doesn't negate the need for governance systems that function well.

Tariffs don't dictate whether a good or service is available, the intention is to increase the costs of imported goods and services to give domestic labor a chance to compete fairly.  They've always been part of a healthy multi-national economic landscape, they've just dropped off the radar of policy makers for so long thanks to the insanity of the WTO that nobody knows how to even talk about them with intelligence, let alone implement something that would actually accomplish what needs to be done.

Tariffs are so far away from the ideals of central planning it's almost funny to see them used in the same paragraph.  If we have concerns about a New World Order at the level of the WTO and UN, IMF, and ABC XYZ, then tariffs are the way out of that pit of vipers, not a reason to jump into one.

And this is from someone who considers himself to be a hard left progressive.  Take it with a grain of salt. 
 Maybe not, but we would still have all the problems with government that we have. Funding is the only way government can grow and intrude more in our lives. Whether that take it or make it doesn't matter in the grand scheme. The fundamental issues remain the same. We should neither spend on debt nor spend on money obtained through force. They're both the same thing: theft. 
 I’ve been thinking about this too. The endgame of the tariff is a rebalancing of production of goods to bolster US-made products and impact labor force skill sets and job opportunities. This goal of on-shoring jobs and factories is a long-game play, and the multi-decade time-horizon effort would be worth some short term pain if successful. The short-term pain would come in the form of price increases on imported products, but this is not the same as inflation. The money supply isn’t the cause of the price going up, rather it’s a supply chain cost-of-goods expense line item added to the total final price. This means your dollar has the same purchasing power as yesterday before the tariff hit your desired item. In this case a Box Fan, let’s say. Your Walmart sourced cheap Chinese-made Hachum 8” box fan (this is real) is now $20 instead of $12. This happens across a high percentage of items across our shopping pathways because of how much we import. But, that’s the point, to only attack that vector, only the imported ones. The Vornado 8” fan that sits on the shelf next to it that are manufactured in the US in Kansas, are still $20. Now you can’t get that $12 one but it didn’t raise every price on every item throughout the store. This logic will serve you as you look throughout the supply chain of every industry. Getting more micro, the motor that Vornado may import to assemble into their product at their plant may need new domestic sourcing to stop their retail price from being too impacted. It’s a shuffle that lasts decades to realign. But it is not inflation.  
 The irony is that it will be neither Canada nor Mexico paying those tariffs, it will be the American people when they purchase goods.  I wonder if the electorate understood this? 
 Until Canada and Mexico impose their own retalitroy tarrifs in return