I see where your head is at but I think you're wrong about this. Trezor doesn't get it's due bc they supported shitcoin firmwares, but all they did was add SD card support. I haven't seen a single person get pwned using the Trezor suite of products. QR is a huge innovation and you know it, but I think you're taking this stance as you don't seem to care about the FOSS aspect - correct me if I'm wrong but that's my hunch.
I hope you also realize the vulnerabilies that they left their customers open to. These great innovators. You talk about multisig ... https://image.nostr.build/436524bf19f17e8468fb5df0f3995ed55f47ece63fec9b5c13f7940fe1ab8194.jpg
No, you're wrong about this. Trezor and Coldcard are very different things if you get down to the physical design. Trezor getting pwned -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT9y-KQbqi4 QR is a hack. No hate, I use it everyday I do care about the FOSS aspect, not my business though
They can literally do this with every HWW. Which already happened with the mk2 as I showed you. And mk1. You're so salty it hurts.
Why do you think MK4 has two SEcure elements now? Because one was safe enough? It's a never ending rabbit hole of close source stuff. I prefer stateless & QR. Or USB and wipe. You can repeat your garbage about QR & conveniently talk about NFC being able to be neutered...but you can't take away from the security benefits. Sorry kid,
so your threat model is less severe, happy for you
My threat model takes into account people who act like experts but aren't. https://bitbox.swiss/blog/coldcard-isolation-bypass/
Vulnerable AF, this wouldn't be acceptable if any other "brand" has this going after so many years in biz. They didn't pay a single bounty, fuggin shady fucks. nostr:nevent1qqspmv5g2na728re2xwvs0arga8cmtuhjy7mgsfayjcrcxmwjprfgqspzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7szyr3zvzn67vanhgcqwsg3c3t8j080trf2ks79jedahdj4ly8ewwv6cqcyqqqqqqg7m0ugn