Rabble was unable to censor as he desired, but he was "Community Noting" as a fallback.

He was also using a centralised opaque regime-linked service to do it, and you're not.

But the concept is the same - a (more or less) centralised "source of truth" gets to visibly assert authority over other people's speech. 

 Except nothing said this system could not be built on a WoT — not a follow based one but actual trust 

 So, rating our follows for trustworthiness?

That's okay then. 

I don't mind, but I also don't see the need. My follows call out BS all the time. 

 I agree we need to move away from follow based systems, but what can take its place as a metric for trust?