Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
pleblee | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +4 
 I fail to understand this one, despite seeing it in the newsletter every other week.

lhs is logarithmic
rhs is linear

Seems like a flawed comparison, but I don't really grok most of the macro stuff anyway
▲ ▼
LynAlden | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +13 
 Bitcoin is on an exponential structural tech/adoption trend, but the cyclical direction of that trend is highly correlated with global liquidity.
▲ ▼
omgbiscuits | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Is that correlation more about sentiment than actual monetary value (as the bitcoin axis is exponential)? As there’s more liquidity, people become more comfortable with storing value in the network, perhaps?
▲ ▼
steven8rown 👊 | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 I thought the correction was linked to the options market and getting rid of some of the built up leverage.
▲ ▼
334 | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 May be why 2021 looks like volcano with caldera since it blew its leveraged top off ;)
▲ ▼
steven8rown 👊 | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Maybe my friend. I'm learning to just hold all the way through now.

Stay #nostr 💜
▲ ▼
Bwok | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Would be more useful if both were on the same scale (log) or standardized scores for a single y-axis
▲ ▼
∇ Gradient Descent | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Correlation doesn't mean 1:1 linear relation.

An observation can be "everytime that A goes up, B follows" and vice versa - even if scales are completely different.

Correlation also doesn't mean causation. It's an observation that Lyn presents here.
▲ ▼
frphank | 7 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Aren't you thinking a bit too much. Why not accept things the way they are it's the best for you.