Oddbean

Ok, but adverse event doesn't mean it was a death. And I'm not seeing a huge spike from 2020 to 2021 in young people in the CDC data. It seems overall mortality increased in just about every age group, which can be explained from COVID itself. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/images/databriefs/451-500/db456-fig3.png

Correlation does not equal causation. Even OpenVAERS says that as a disclaimer at the bottom of their page. A LOT of people got the vaccine. Anybody that died for any reason within a certain time frame after getting the vaccine could be reported as an adverse event.

$boost Causation isn't the standard used for drug safety. That would be Insane! Irresponsible and totally unscientific. The Maximum! number of #deaths or serious #injuries allowed for a #drug to be approved for the general public is ZERO!!! The Maximum number of deaths or serious injuries allowed for a drug to stay on the market is ZERO!!! Therefore we don't use causation. We use strong suspicion or signals. Aka temporal correlations. A human life is too Precious!!! to risk on causation. It can take decades to prove causation. By then you would have millions of needless deaths and murders like we have from the so-called covid #vaccines..🤡💊💉💀😠

💥 prism created 💥 Your note received 2 reposts ⚡zap this note on nostrudel.ninja, snort.social, amethyst or on any client that supports zap splits nostr:nevent1qqsvs28623w35rdgu5mmkwwkwkytw28prv9yjvp2j05u8hs3rtettes9sr48h

Correct, its unreliable, as I stated, the various independent research shows the most conservative estimate is that it underreports by a factor of 16. Do you have any research that contradicts this? Saying "its unreliable" without context is nothing but a dodge, because it's explicitly unreliable by missing the overwhelming majority of cases. If any of these institutions weren't malicious, they would do a thorough and case by case investigation of what has been reported *because that's exactly how you confirm this one way or the other.* The most alarming part of all of this is their total dismissal of something *they aren't even investigating.* To make a claim about something for which they haven't even done the **most basic investigation** of on the very reporting system created for this exact issue, is just flat lying. They cannot defend the statements they make because they have explicitly NOT investigated it. The fact that they dismiss it without any exploration is gross negligence, at best. If they think some of these have nothing to do with the vaccine, it's almost like one ought to look to find out.