That’s not how I would personally think about marketshare. I would measure market share more along the lines of “what portion of identity-based applications can I log in with via my nsec?”
When measuring Nostr’s global market share, however, we need to be aware that “hybrid” Nostr apps will not have the same freedom power as “Nostr only” apps. If it uses Nostr as identity layer, and stores user data in a local DB, is it really freedom tech? Hybrid apps are inevitable. Question is, how do we measure success and promote freedom tech?
I think we're agreeing. This is much more in line with an extended nostr eco system. Remove the relay part, and allow logging in with nsec identity is essentially the bridge to the wider web, for which the TAM is 1000x bigger. Relays end up being a small part of that.
Phrasing it another way. nost is far bigger than nostR. But nost itself is basically the web + taproot.
thank you for explaining. what is Nost?... I haven't heard of that
Nost is something I just made up : Notes and other Stuff It's much bigger than NostR which depends on relays And adds an important element of taproot and schnorr to the web. What you could call an nsec too. This has a much larger total addressable market than the relay part. I knew fiatjaf for many years before nostr. I kept saying to him that the data must be transport agnostic. Either by luck or design, it is in nostr. That's the path that will let it scale to a far bigger market, though most have not yet realized this. I think Lyn has.