Looks like we're both thinking about this stuff at the same time. You may want to consider avoiding address reuse in NIP-570 like in my suggestions 🤙

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqgqqqqpuqdkz6ywxwevs50xgu6mte0kmnz73sl2f7yn506tjexdssv97da4m

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqgqqqqpwh8000p75krkj37hnvgft54vaxj42w5kchedpqhzr99qy85r8vwd0 

 Wait, does this NIP-570 already avoid address reuse? I may have misunderstood at first