Oddbean new post about login | logout https://m.primal.net/JWgs.png woo, on-chain zaps and antizaps working on testnet. https://mempool.space/testnet4/tx/6d8d2c26fb6f68097c7bbca6843d3ef475368d6211c837632446bc4a0f3f162a Draft NIP 570 https://gist.github.com/melvincarvalho/15f767fee8ed3e14197b322235e9fe8d
👀👀 nostr:nevent1qqsx7pdayygap2ltl5x2dj0470cervxj5xp98zp2msusrx7mv78g4mgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsdulkdrc5hdf4dktl6taxmsxnasykghdnf32sqmnc7w6km2hhav3grqsqqqqqpxq09z8
lmao on-chain zaps? why not i guess? 😉
Anti zaps?
Funny how we all seem to be struggling to understand what we're reading. Maybe the anti zaps can just take back tips that haven't yet been transferred again?
Opposite of a zap. A zap is an upvote with a payment (to the user). And antizap is a downvote with a payment. Has been covered before. Someone made notes here. https://github.com/cromatikap/nostr-reputation-authority
Thank you for continuing your work, and assistance
https://m.primal.net/JWnB.png yw, here's a couple of refrences (which I've now added to the gist). Thanks for the feedback! https://nostr.at/nevent1qqsr5yln0f96nmnnnu8lr09pvrdt7mrayu4537q6mhfahlcu3k0qxfgzyr08ang799m2dtdjl7jlfkup5lvp9j9mv6v25qxu78nk4k64alty24m3gjw and https://github.com/cromatikap/nostr-reputation-authority/issues/1
Why would someone pay for dislikes? I hate what you posted Here take some money 🤷🏻♂️
Payment must be burnt, go to something neutral, or to the community.
Like a neighborhood watch? Cost to make sure drunk uncle albert doesn’t get into the stores
on-chain zaps for when your zap is phat and you don't care about instant gratification. nostr:note1duzm6gg36z47hlgv5myltul3jxcd9gvz2wyz4hpeqxdakeuw3tks88f928
awesome!
nostr:nevent1qqsx7pdayygap2ltl5x2dj0470cervxj5xp98zp2msusrx7mv78g4mgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygx70mx3u2tk56km9la97ndcrf7cztytke5c4gqdeu08dtd4tm7kg5psgqqqqqqsf555d6
please no
Wouldn't it be better to just transfer the BTC to a UTXO the nsec can unlock?
That's exactly what it does. The npub and taproot addresses are the same key.
ohhh I missed that! Nice! Let's go!
I'll add a sentence in the NIP to make it clearer. Thanks for the feedback!
Added: "Note: that taproot address and npub are interchangable addresses with a different prefix. Sats are transferred to a UTXO the nsec can unlock."
Example: https://nostrapps.github.io/taproot/
Address reuse as a feature?
We may have misunderstood the premise
Looks like we're both thinking about this stuff at the same time. You may want to consider avoiding address reuse in NIP-570 like in my suggestions 🤙 nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqgqqqqpuqdkz6ywxwevs50xgu6mte0kmnz73sl2f7yn506tjexdssv97da4m nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqgqqqqpwh8000p75krkj37hnvgft54vaxj42w5kchedpqhzr99qy85r8vwd0
Wait, does this NIP-570 already avoid address reuse? I may have misunderstood at first
ついに on-chain zap が爆誕 nostr:nevent1qqsx7pdayygap2ltl5x2dj0470cervxj5xp98zp2msusrx7mv78g4mgpzpmhxue69uhk2tnwdaejumr0dshsygx70mx3u2tk56km9la97ndcrf7cztytke5c4gqdeu08dtd4tm7kg5psgqqqqqqsynytky nostr:nprofile1qqsz6kmyqn04xt0qstv7wlmlgft6daplk7dmnh5d6wk8ma0x6j6spvqpzdmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ue0qydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnhv4ehgetjde38gcewvdhk6tcpz9mhxue69uhnzdps9enrw73wd9hj7y8s04w
