Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
tf | 3 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 "but TF you can have multiple of those single control points"

No, no you can't when the single control point must ingest the entire network

At best the single control point moves to the AppViews... at $$$ cost (who pays?)

"parallel networks" = build yourself a Twitter, nostr:nprofile1qqsrhuxx8l9ex335q7he0f09aej04zpazpl0ne2cgukyawd24mayt8gprfmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5hszxmhwden5te0wfjkccte9emk2um5v4exucn5vvhxxmmd9us2xuyp was right

I'm not saying that this system will be a social negative

I think quite probably the *opposite*

It's just not decentralized or even decentralize-able 😄

So it's something else

Something without a name

Centralized with plugin architecture

nostr:nevent1qqsyeftfl00606p7dddwrlaevyk9uvur2qggsr6zagmf66yg87u5jcspz3mhxw309akx7cmpd35x7um58g6rsd3e9upzq6q7e8qrw2urkz2r3p35py4lf0udpygvgvhghp7204ezetl83d88qvzqqqqqqy9qxqac
▲ ▼
fiatjaf | 3 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 That's probably not going to happen, there will be one central hub and maybe some fringe others that no one will use.

But if it truly happened and Bluesky ended up with, say, 16 different hubs then that would require apps to listen to all of those before building their feed (and then that app view would become the central point of the network) or the network would be splitted in multiple with no way to reconcile all the parts.