Oddbean new post about login | logout Nostr supports both edit and delete. You’re apps that choose to hide that functionality because rhe creators don’t like edit and delete.
Fake news. An app can’t simply edit and delete posts that are broadcasted to and stored on relays operated and managed outside of that applications control sphere.
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/09.md Read the spec. Even relays that choose not to implement Nostr, eventually drop all content. Delete is a core part of Nostr and it works. Don’t trust trolls who wish Nostr didn’t support delete. nostr:note178tfxt6r98e4huv5d8vv7u8x0nkhclt0whcep3z8xutu9uuj4yuqf7syk6 Edit works in some apps: nostr:note1te9fy33mg6jax8krp8wwvlh7acagh60q0ylmkunmhzwc5f4kugqqlzsky3
Rabble is correct.
In fact, I sent a request for deletion for two of my notes (that I self-censored because it might cause me trouble in the future) to a couple hundred relays and they were wiped out from relays that I was aware of almost instantly. Sure, they might still exist somewhere, but deletion is inherently part of the protocol.
Unless you're posting to f7z relay. Pablo has not enabled deletion. Pls request him to
how does one send a request for deleting posts? currently on damus, but if one uses another client, can one do it there?
Yes. I used https://nostr-delete.vercel.app/ to delete note1 prefixed identifiers.
Here’s a video of me posting a reply here then deleting it. https://v.nostr.build/3Pa0k.mp4
longest typed sentence ever
😆
:D
Delete implies the ability to forcibly remove a note from existence. Are ya’ll saying the “spec” forces a relay operator to remove a post and stop serving it? Or is this “spec” simply a voluntary action relay operators can abide by? It’s important to communicate factual information to users, and the way I see it once you’ve “published” to outside relays the authority over that contents storage and removal is outside of the users control. Not saying things can’t be removed from nostr, just saying that giving a user the right to “delete” from other people’s hardware seems like a bit of poor use of language, which isn’t unusual for nostr developers.
You're not wrong. It's voluntary. What should get communicated is that you can absolutely send a request for deletion from clients that support it and that it is a best effort delete, but the data might still exist in perpetuity until the end of time on machines that don’t respect your request for deletion. Even if the signed content gets deleted from all machines, people can still take screenshots! Expectations should be curbed.