Oddbean new post about | logout
 Microsoft Tyranny Agenda:

1) Create a culture where you're discriminated against employment unless you have a Linked-In

2) Force you to verify your real details on Linked-In.

3) By agreeing to be on Linked-In, you agree to train AI on your data, and monitor the web of all human interaction

4) Allow radical woke socialists to view your real job details, so they can cancel and control you.  This purges "freedom speech" from positions of power.

5) Pressure you take drugs (labeling it a vaccine), to keep the job.  

The end goal is to crush freedom, by forcing anyone who isn't self-employed to be cancellable.  And by controlling everyone's visible on the platform, they control the flow of funds.  

The answer is clear: Start a business, accept cryptocurrency, and communicate through means you control. 
 deleted LinkedIn 5months ago and Facebook 4y ago never looked back 
 Microsoft Tyranny Agenda:

1) Create a culture where you're discriminated against employment unless you have a Linked-In

2) Force you to verify your real details on Linked-In.

3) By agreeing to be on Linked-In, you agree to train AI on your data, and monitor the web of all human interaction

4) Allow radical woke socialists to view your real job details, so they can cancel and control you.  This purges "freedom speech" from positions of power.

5) Pressure you take drugs (labeling it a vaccine), to keep the job.  

The end goal is to crush freedom, by forcing anyone who isn't self-employed to be cancellable.  And by controlling everyone's visible on the platform, they control the flow of funds.  

The answer is clear: Start a business, accept cryptocurrency, and communicate through means you control. 
 The scary part is that universities promoted everyone to create a LinkedIn - some schools required it.  Along with subscriptions to the NYT.  They were the useful idiots to promote the agenda. 
 FUCK I'VE REPOSTED THIS MY ACCIDENT 
 there is no reliable scientific evidence that vaccines would be unsafe or ineffective. science is indeed controlled by the capital, but without accepting completely ridiculous ideas, like a secret actually strong world government, almost all scientists from all countries of the world could not come to a consensus if this were not so. when reading individual counter-studies, you need to be able to distinguish between proud lone wolves carrying the Truth, and madmen screaming that «breathing is harmful for health, we just don't understand it yet, and science is silent because it's corrupt». talking more sharply, some studies show that going throughout covid infection may lower your iq — so you should reduce your chances to get infected (including for the second time), or you may become an antivaxxer.

speaking about radical woke, if your work causes hostility in a large part of society (large enough so they could cancel you meaningfully), PERHAPS there actually may be some problem with the work. the work one's doing ain't even connected to the continuous yapping of the right-wing libertarians about freedom of speech* (majority of whom have never experienced any actual censorship, unless were spreading calls for commiting hate crimes) — it's a freedom of work or something, no? 

in any case i, however, agree that everyone should have the right to privacy of their work history. and freedom of speech (taking responsibility). and freedom of work, perhaps. 

otherwise i warmly share the theses of your publication, and agree with them. I've even accidentally reposted this on my acc while trying to reply 
 dave smith debates. tom woods diary of psychosis. americas front line doctors.  peter mccullough
check those out