there is no reliable scientific evidence that vaccines would be unsafe or ineffective. science is indeed controlled by the capital, but without accepting completely ridiculous ideas, like a secret actually strong world government, almost all scientists from all countries of the world could not come to a consensus if this were not so. when reading individual counter-studies, you need to be able to distinguish between proud lone wolves carrying the Truth, and madmen screaming that «breathing is harmful for health, we just don't understand it yet, and science is silent because it's corrupt». talking more sharply, some studies show that going throughout covid infection may lower your iq — so you should reduce your chances to get infected (including for the second time), or you may become an antivaxxer.

speaking about radical woke, if your work causes hostility in a large part of society (large enough so they could cancel you meaningfully), PERHAPS there actually may be some problem with the work. the work one's doing ain't even connected to the continuous yapping of the right-wing libertarians about freedom of speech* (majority of whom have never experienced any actual censorship, unless were spreading calls for commiting hate crimes) — it's a freedom of work or something, no? 

in any case i, however, agree that everyone should have the right to privacy of their work history. and freedom of speech (taking responsibility). and freedom of work, perhaps. 

otherwise i warmly share the theses of your publication, and agree with them. I've even accidentally reposted this on my acc while trying to reply