All of that is well argued, but looking at most of them, you have to take a less obvious interpretation to come to your conclusions.

You didn't address the clearest claim and the explicit accusation and interpretation made by His opponents.

John 10:32-38 "Jesus answered them, “I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?” The Jews answered Him, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make Yourself out to be God.” Jesus answered them, “Has it not been written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? 35If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), do you say of Him, whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’? If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; but if I do them, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, so that you may know and understand that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father.”

In this passage the Jewish leaders clearly interpret Jesus's claims as claiming He is God.  Jesus does not deny this accusation.  He makes additional claims of being the Son of God, the Father in Me, and I in the Father.  If He was not claiming to be God, He would've denied the accusation instead of making other claims that sound like a claim to God (even if you could argue in some way that He could mean something else).  In this context, it would make zero sense to make these statements when He is accused of blasphemy and claiming to be God.  If He is not God, He should immediately make that clear, otherwise He is misleading the Jewish leaders which He would not do. 

 I didn't want to get into that 8 days ago because reality is quite a radical departure from the mainstream Christian understanding. If God sent us, and we are God's sons, then we are gods. There is only one creator, there is only one father, there is only one begotten Son, and there is only one spirit of God within us, but as son's of God, we too are gods along with our Lord Jesus Christ. 

 the accusation Jesus’ opponents made was false, Jesus didn’t make himself to God, he says that he is the Son of God

 

 Check out my longform post.  I give detailed evidence that He did claim to be God. 

 There is no evidence to prove that Jesus is God. 

The question of who Jesus is has been answered by Simon Peter with these words:

 “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” 

(Matthew 16:16)

To this Jesus replied:

“Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven.

If your faith says something else about Jesus you are in deep trouble



 

 I find it interesting that in your analysis of John 1 you stop right before the verses which clearly identify the Word from verse 1 as Jesus the Christ. I'll post in the KJV since it seems to be your preferred version.

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version., (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Jn 1:14–17. 

 I did not intentionally leave out anything. I left nothing to to be misunderstood. I certainly didn't delete the verse from the Bible. "The word was made flesh" is plainly clear with the clarification of the previous verses. If you can't see it for yourself, its not up to me to illuminate it further.

If you go so far as to accuse me of being dishonest, I'm happy to shake the dust off of my feet and move on. 

 I did not intend to imply you leaving it out intentionally. However I do agree that verse 14 is clarified by the previous verses, which makes it even more apparent that John is declaring clearly that Jesus is divine and is Himself God. Whether you want to say it is Trinitarian or not we could discuss a different time. However I would say this is clearly referring to the Jewish 2 powers in Heaven doctrine which describes God as 2 persons. 

 Lets not get into wacky Jewish Talmudic doctrines. Its not a question of whether our Father, God the creator, has two or three heads. Its all ridiculous on its face. What is important is whether we have access to God, through Jesus Christ through faith that Christ is our Lord.
I primarily provide my analysis as evidence that my profession of faith isn't arbitrary or unfounded. I come from a heritage of trinitarianism and would never have dared believe anything different. It wasn't until I prayed to know the truth that it was revealed to me, and for this I am grateful, and I've found through this and other elucidations of scripture that a fuller, stronger and less confounding believing is possible. 

 It wasn't actually a Talmudic doctrine. It was held by the Israelites all the way back into the first temple period. But I agree, we can set it aside.

And I agree. The primary message of the Bible does not depend on Trinitarian doctrines. However I do believe it to be important for deeper understanding of our creator. But we will have all of eternity to get to know Him better and I guarantee we will all be wrong about something and will learn better when we see Him face to face. 

 I think all we need to know is that he is our Father and he loves us more than we can fathom 

 I think we also need to know that we are sinners incapable of living up to His standard and yet He provided a way for us to live with Him for eternity regardless of our failings. 

 Before we are saved, yes. After we are saved through Christ, we can strive to perfection. 

 Yes, we strive for perfection. However we will never reach it this side of our resurrection. 

 Exactly 

 Yes, Confession is key.

"If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." (1 John 1:9)

We are not righteous in ourselves or our deeds:
"as it is written, “There is none righteous , not even one ;" (Romans 3:10)

All of our righteousness comes from Jesus:
"He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." (2 Corinthians 5:21) 

 Last night I couldn't sleep because my  mind was going nonstop based on our discussion yesterday. (I like being challenged, but not when it makes me unable to sleep)  I have found the best way to shut up my mind is to organize and write down my thoughts.  I wrote down a defense of the deity of Jesus that is much more coherent than what I threw together yesterday.  It has many more evidences (and better ones) than I gave yesterday and where I address verses from yesterday, I believe I explained my logic better.  I hope you will take a look at it.  

I'm not sure how to link to a nostr post, so I'll try to tag you on the longform post.

It will also be available on my Substack on Sunday.  https://trustjesus.substack.com/