2 

 Mine. 😜 

 
https://image.nostr.build/c7462644aa11f24af21f495e42849dd98785966b7e5e5c9b995c2258415cd61f.jpg 

 2 only looks like the best when you already have the context of the other parts. The reality is that having only a third of the truth isn't enough information to be called truth or fact.  

 2 because it looks like the truth is propelled forward and expanding. 

 Centre maximum info.. Although doting hidden lines better again.. 

 Maybe like photons, DNA or the solar system… an elliptical helix / rising spiral. At least that's my perspective. 

 All of them and none at the same time. 
You need to expose yourself to a different versions of subjective truths to develop your own opinion about the topic.  

 2nd 

 Middle 

 I wrote an article about this in 2016:

https://mikehardcastle.com/2016/09/08/sometimes-both-sides-are-right/
 

 I would say 2nd 

 2..  

 i second that 

 Truth is objective, meaning that is not based on the perceptions of human beings.
Truth is singular. There is no such thing as my truth, his truth... There is only ONE truth.

Truth could be represented as frecquency "waves". If you are more aligned with the truth frecquency, you are closer to know the truth.
https://m.primal.net/HgIy.png 
 

 But trueth can easily be something objective but outside of our grasp, so all we are left with are our subjective approximations (my truth, your, etc..).

I think that is a good way forward as long as we remember that nobody knows the absolute truth, so we can take bits and pieces of trueth insode all perspectives.


I.E. here the truth is the 3D object, but in a 2D screen we need different POVs to get a grasp in the whole thing.

Also I think this way of looking at things make us a bit more humble an less prone to believe in grandiose schemes like central planning or that crap. A.K.A. the fatal conceit 

 wow didnt know you got that right
i dont get in touch with a lot of people who can say words like you did, happy you speak the words (truth)

the image source is mark passio right

i try to listen to the 1000 hours plus material
but it takes time

now i see why you respond it
i only saw the symbols first and thought @calle 👁️⚡👁️
is looking for a truth symbol

but good that you took the conversation to the perspective / perception level, which is something different to the truth

i guess you also found the lost word!? 

 Try cylindrical coordinates. Coordinate transformations are fun. How do you know there are only 2 or 3 dimensions? 😁

The truth is more complicated than it appears. 

 Right 

 All of them 🐶🐾🫡 

 Tree sap is medicinal/medicine 

 There is no "best" perspective. The hability to see all three, will step you, closer to truth! 

 Truth
https://image.nostr.build/5a4de26d82a4aee0e34a41487719ce179b0675b95ce973c1669013046c39dfdd.gif 

 The isometric view. 

 My gut is the middle. 

 The straight lines, but they're backwards - they should be small on the left, large on the rigth (i.e. we grow in knowledge with increasing truth) 

 You think time moves from left to right only? Just curious where this comes from. 

 Together they look like an eye,  but I’m fond of the coil/concentric circles in the center . 

 all… 

 perspective

nostr:nevent1qqs0v5ew9qu5gt6t0ungu0mwqcusgt7cgnt37uwmd37sjd4m4zd4g8qpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvuhsygzsm98u9kzcp35zkpc62shck8335gqtq5yt4w26xwl0pp2a72qavvpsgqqqqqqs9wl0tq 

 
https://image.nostr.build/af1d4c81a8170efd8e986d1cfb482c3cf397df0d7122e0dda073c81b800fc6b0.jpg 

 While they are all valid perspectives, I believe the center view gives the most information about the objects in the scene. 

 1st one on the left is my preferred choice. 
However, I could choose the center one to bring more graphical perspective / depth… 

 The one in the middle! 

 the whole image, add arrows to indicate  rotation. 

 plan view 

 So true! 

 yes

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant 

 The problem with that analogy is that there is one perspective with the actual truth of the elephant... the third person who is holding the camera 

 not sure where you found a camera in the parable 

 mine. 

 The middle one. Truth twister. 😊 

 Middle is strongest. The freedom funnel of truth 

 I suggest reading “Flatland” by Edwin Abbot. 

 Feminist Epistemology about to trigger the maxis. 😂 

 None. All three need to fused together and even then . . . 

By the way, @jackspirko is wanting to get you on his podcast. Pretty big audience. 

 🌲IYKYK 

 Neither. 

 The best perspective is the perspective that reality is not two dimensional. 

 1. The core is the truth. 

 https://fountain.fm/episode/gWp50gR0J20gapegGmo2 

 Truth is geometrical then 

 They all are 😉  

 all.. but 2 is funner 

 The one we can't see. 

 the first
its like a pyramid with the view from above
people need to get out of ignorance
and accept the truth and the consequences
its not easy, you have to work on yourself 

 

https://m.primal.net/HggI.jpg
 

 The middle one reveals the truth of the other two, being 3 dimensional, so the middle one is the best perspective as it interprets the other two truths and only this one can 😊 

 A Copernican inspired perspective ist the best.


nostr:nevent1qqs0v5ew9qu5gt6t0ungu0mwqcusgt7cgnt37uwmd37sjd4m4zd4g8qpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcpzq5xeflpdskqvdq4swxj59793uvdzqzc9pzatjk3nhmcg2h0js8trqvzqqqqqqy5jzvpt 

 https://i.nostr.build/eZgJ4.png