Oddbean

"I can't justify my position so I'll just assume it's hero worship" Circle back to the original argument and make the case for it. You assert NVK on the board is bad but could only find one instance of potential malfeasance that was put in check by another board member. Highlighting how robust a 9 person board is at keep things clean. Then you ignore a very clear track record of technical understanding (probably good for a board member to have) and call it hero worship. So again. Go fuck yourself.

As I asked before can you point me to where I can read additional minutes of subcommittee and decision votes? How would I attempt to provide clear examples if I don't have the documents to prove such things. I can only point to what I have access to. I take away a differing opinion on this one instance of public minutes showing that NVK attempts to do things that subvert fairness. If someone only does one bad thing do they not deserve reprocussions? Besides I smell lots of smoke and all know where there's smoke, theres fire. Again NVK may be technical but there are many other technical people that can provide guideance without compromising principles.