Just going to leave this here for all the Saylor haters. https://m.primal.net/Ldur.jpg
My Bitcoin bank is mint.minibits.cash/Bitcoin
How did you set this up?
Love it, I am fascinated by ecash and things like fedimints! I agree that it mostly defeats the purpose of Bitcoin to hold it in some fiat institution. But, I’m also sure that a lot of people will do that until they get wrecked and fall down the rabbit hole like the rest of us.
I run a Bitcoin bank at mint.utxo.one and Saylor can still go fuck himself
What's the deal with these mints? What features do they offer? How is it different from running your own LND?
They handle all the lightning stuff on the back end and you don't have to worry about it. You just send them your sats and they issue you a shitcoin. basically. So you're interoperable with the lightning network through their token. It's a great UX, but of course it's custodial so they can rugpull you and they could also print tokens that weren't backed by Sats. so it's a bank as the OP describes. you can use anybody's mint because on the back end they're connected to all the other LN nodes. So if you trust that nostr:nprofile1qqsw9n8heusyq0el9f99tveg7r0rhcu9tznatuekxt764m78ymqu36cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuat50phjummwv5hszymhwden5te0wahhgtn4w3ux7tn0dejj7qg4waehxw309an8yetwwvh82arcduhx7mn99uuwx66a guy, you can use his tokens. or you and your buddies could spin up a mint.
It sounds like it might be good for casual users with small amounts of sats. It's an easy, low-cost way to use lightning without any of the complexities or expenses involved with running your own lightning node. I can see where it has its place in the greater community, but not much value if you already run your own node and manage your own bitcoin.
I agree some combination of lighting and ecash is the path forward. However, there will undoubtedly be many different solutions with their own tradeoffs and we are free to choose what we want to use.
I'm all for a variety of options. Not everyone is able or interested in running their own lightning node, especially if zaps are the only thing they're using it for. It sounds like a nice all-in-one solution for casual users that doesn't require a big financial or experiential commitment. It makes sats more accessible to a larger audience.
Fedimints and Cashu are more akin to free banking. Bailed out banks can GFY.
yeah its a nice try bro but hes talking about chaumian ecash banks. which is maybe also something Saylor could do and we'd cut him a break. but they're still custodial and a rugpull risk so.... maybe not.
Everything has trade offs. I think Ecash is fascinating but personally I keep everything in cold storage aside from some sats for zaps. But what Hal is pointing out here is similar to what Saylor has been talking about. That the option to take self custody at any time forces players to act more honestly. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t also introduce counterparty risk.
Uh, awkward... https://m.primal.net/LeDb.png
Keyword: required Bitcoin eliminates the need for a third party which completely changes the dynamics. That doesn’t mean that every person in the world is going to suddenly become an entirely self sovereign cypherpunk unfortunately.