#monero is not a shitcoin. it's the coin for untraceable privacy. stack #btc, use sparrow's whirlpool and spend anonymously with monero. it's privacy by default. 

 #cryptocurrency #blockchain #regulation 

 VEN: Crypto enthusiasts are always on the lookout for new projects to invest in, but there’s also a growing sense of anxiety about where the industry is headed in terms of regulation. The past year has seen numerous high-profile crypto-related arrests and investigations, as well as increased scrutiny from governments around the world.

The question on everyone’s mind is: will this lead to greater regulatory clarity or will it stifle innovation? And what does that mean for investors?

In this article, we take a look at some of the most pressing issues facing crypto in 2021 and how they could impact the industry’s future growth.

1. The SEC vs. ICOs
One of the biggest regulatory challenges facing the crypto industry is the ongoing legal battle between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and initial coin offerings (ICOs).
The SEC has been cracking down hard on fraudulent ICOs, which have become a common way for startups to raise funds. In 2021, there’s been an increase in enforcement actions against crypto-related businesses that have violated securities laws.
This has led to uncertainty among investors and entrepreneurs alike about how to navigate the regulatory landscape.
The good news is that some progress is being made on this front, with the SEC recently proposing a framework for regulating token sales that would allow them to be registered as securities offerings. This could provide more clarity for businesses looking to raise funds through ICOs.
However, it remains to be seen how widespread adoption of this approach will be, and there are still many unanswered questions about what the SEC’s long-term strategy is in terms of regulating crypto.
2. The CFTC vs. Derivatives
Another important regulatory issue facing the crypto industry is the ongoing legal battle between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and cryptocurrency derivatives trading platforms.
The CFTC has been cracking down on fraudulent derivative products related to Bitcoin and other cryptos, which have become a common way for retail investors to speculate on the price of crypto.
In 2021, there’s been an increase in enforcement actions against crypto-related businesses that have violated commodities laws. This has led to uncertainty among investors and traders alike about how to navigate the regulatory landscape.
The good news is that some progress is being made on this front as well, with the CFTC recently proposing new rules for regulating cryptocurrency derivatives. However, it remains to be seen how widespread adoption of these rules will be, and there are still many unanswered questions about what the CFTC’s long-term strategy is in terms of regulating crypto.
3. Global Regulatory Harmonization
One of the biggest challenges facing the crypto industry is global regulatory harmonization. Different countries have different laws and regulations around cryptocurrency, which can make it difficult for businesses to navigate the legal landscape.
This is particularly true in China, where cryptocurrencies are currently banned but there has been some recent movement towards allowing certain blockchain-related activities. In other parts of Asia, such as South Korea and Japan, crypto regulation remains relatively light.
In Europe, things are a bit more complex, with different countries having different regulatory approaches to cryptocurrency. The EU itself has made efforts towards greater harmonization but there is still much work to be done.
This lack of global regulatory coherence can make it difficult for businesses to operate across borders and can discourage investment in certain regions.
The good news is that there are signs of progress being made on this front, with the G20 recently agreeing to work towards greater regulatory harmonization around cryptocurrency. However, it remains to be seen how effective these efforts will be and how quickly they can be implemented.
4. AML/KYC Compliance
One of the biggest challenges facing the crypto industry is anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) compliance. Cryptocurrency is often used as a way to evade financial regulations, which can make it difficult for businesses to verify the identities of their customers and prevent illicit activity.
In response to this challenge, many crypto businesses have implemented strict KYC protocols, which require users to provide proof of identity before they can access certain services. However, this process can be time-consuming and inconvenient for users, and there are still concerns about how effective these measures really are in preventing illicit activity.
The good news is that there are signs of progress being made on this front as well, with many crypto businesses partnering with third-party KYC providers to help them meet regulatory requirements. However, it remains to be seen how widespread adoption of these measures will be and whether they will truly prevent illicit activity.
In conclusion, the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency is still evolving and there are many challenges facing the industry in terms of regulation. While this can make it difficult for businesses to navigate the legal landscape, there are signs of progress being made towards greater clarity and harmonization. Ultimately, the success of the crypto industry will depend on its ability to strike a balance between innovation and regulatory compliance. 

 Done watching part 1. 

The lack of plausible deniability with Monero is a big problem for me. I want excuses as to why I use potentially privacy preserving techniques that do not incriminate myself directly. Saving on transaction costs is perfect for that. 

Also I dislike the all or nothing stance in general. This is not how life works.  

 interdasting, thanks for sharing ser 

 I don't understand. For plausible deniability, why can't you say you were trying to save on fees with Monero too? Less than a cent.

>"Why didn't you just use Lightning/Ecash then?"
>"Because ecash is custodial and rehypothicateable.
And lightning is too complex and too many annoyance (can't receive offline, ruggable, can't send large amounts, can be forced closed onchain, etc...)"

? 

 Yes that works too but the fact it's a well known so called privacy coin is likely to attract more attention which is counter productive in this scenario 

 And the main features of ecash is it's strong privacy as well. So, I still don't understand why you think it is so different. Anything with that kind of privacy won't be liked, period. 

 Well the thing is nobody knows you owned ecash outside of the mint. It's Bitcoin in Bitcoin out and Lightning in the case of Cashu.  

 Actually I see your point. The only difference in that you need to explain why you sent to a mint instead of why you swapped to Monero. Which isn't much I agree. 

 I guess that is an ever slight difference, but not sure if it is significant. Why else would you be sending to a mint (if that address is known and associated with a mint)? Will at least evoke major suspicion

And if you p2p trade or atomic swap for Monero - this is essentially the same thing as sending Bitcoin to a mint. Probably even better. No one will know you got that Monero aside from your peer (and you'll also likely be anonymous or pseudonymous with these methods too) 

 My understanding is that mints are grassroots initiatives run by one or more individuals which makes them somehow volatiles, hard to find and to take down. 

 Maybe so, but it runs into a catch 22 imo

Well-known mint runners are less likely to rug, but easier to find and take down

Anonymous/Pseudonymous mint runners are harder to find and take down, but it's easier for them to rug-n-run 

 Agreed. There will always be tradeoffs obviously.