@3967703f
I don't know that we can extract the two.
You may have noticed that certain people, like the numbnuts I just responded to in this thread, only views societies in which it's EVEN POSSIBLE to have homelessness as "human history".
@93f3abdb I'm not talking about what is. I'm talking about what should be. That's what I meant. You're talking about something else. This isn't a debate. We were talking about different things. I don't disagree with what you're saying, it's just NOT WHAT I was talking about.
@3967703f
My point is ONLY that there have been societies where homelessness wasn't even a thing.
So it's not a question of "society", it's a question of THIS society.
That's all I'm saying.
@93f3abdb From my very first response, I said I agreed with you. What is this about?
@3967703f
We're not actually having an argument. I'm not sure why you are taking it as such.
@93f3abdb This is my one day off in a period of difficulty. All I want to do is relax. I'm not arguing with you, but I sense some type of resistance on your part to hear what I'm saying to you. ☮️ ✊🏾
@3967703f
Possibly.
I understand your claim.
And I understand the poesy therein.
I just don't think that all human interactions necessarily end up in billionaires and unhoused people.
@93f3abdb Again, I did not suggest that in any way.
Oddbean new post about login | logout