Oddbean new post about | logout
 One is the loneliest number that you'll ever do
Two can be as bad as one
It's the loneliest number since the number one 
 I’m no mathematician, but basic logical reasoning defies the fiction of timeless forces


https://music.apple.com/de/album/one/1440744525?i=1440744526&l=en-GB 
 wrong. 
 A timeless force is kinda wrong if that’s what you mean, but for the sake of discussion, how do you mean wrong? 
 Or do you mean the reconstruction comes out wrong?

maybe that’s not a coincidence. 
 logical reasoning cannot defy what itis based on. and it is based on the "timeless forces".

mmmmmmk? 
 “In general, time is used in quantum theory as an external ('classical') concept. So it is assumed…”
- wiki

Force is a definition of change in dynamic state of matter, which can not exist without a tangible definition of time, which reflects this change, and with time, everything becomes an effect of, which makes time the only force of nature, where everything else is an effect, thus, timeless force is a paradox of logical reasoning.

Wrong how?! 
 Motion and movement calculus is an observation that we can verify, however, progressional movement doesn’t define time itself, and although the effects of time are measurable and well defined, time itself is lacking the necessary understanding not to be confused with a clock. 
 https://media0.giphy.com/media/93jGp8tRQHzgfenWWG/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952j4gyz86o1rqyzkbl9gvqz32wfe3gir7q6a6qhy35&ep=v1_internal_gif_by_id&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g 
 To elaborate as discussed in my published “impossible silence” article, the future is always more complex than the past, but the standard model only has a clock as measurement. 
 Timelessness is not the same concept as the clock running out of time. 
 https://www.amazon.ca/Anachronism-Time-Iain-Mackenzie/dp/1853110892#immersive-view_1729201737975 
 Haven’t read, and tried to find some cliffnotes or something to have a conversation about, and the earliest they can deliver a printed version is in a few weeks, but uncertain how anachronistic discussion would solve the standards timeless clock paradox. 
 Our organic mechanical now is that nuclear fusion ball of fire shining upon us, and the moon, earth’s gravitational backslap, about a mechanical second away, which again makes logical sense considering gravitational waves inertia being the same as “light speed”, and the distance between earth and the moon, about a second.
The correlation as well fits the idea that mars is the solar backslap in a terra centric but gravitational dominated solar system, so to say. https://image.nostr.build/526ab8fd724bcb55b633481d791d17005979f74718ecf6e2c16684ab72c7dba9.jpg  
 Let’s also not forget, that the clock is not ticking the same rate everywhere.

Dilating in correlation to gravitational effects of time.

I’m not a scientist, nor a physicist nor a mathematician to present a scientific method on this thesis, but happy to discuss the logical reasoning nonetheless. 
 All which requires organic brains to produce. 
 Or organic life at least 
 Something is for sure, a clock on earth doesn’t really represent anything but the day’s progress.

Not the same as a Uranus clock

https://youtu.be/kWp6hZ-5ndc?si=A-qzXHkrlpTk61gb