Oddbean new post about | logout
 Timelessness is not the same concept as the clock running out of time. 
 https://www.amazon.ca/Anachronism-Time-Iain-Mackenzie/dp/1853110892#immersive-view_1729201737975 
 Haven’t read, and tried to find some cliffnotes or something to have a conversation about, and the earliest they can deliver a printed version is in a few weeks, but uncertain how anachronistic discussion would solve the standards timeless clock paradox. 
 Our organic mechanical now is that nuclear fusion ball of fire shining upon us, and the moon, earth’s gravitational backslap, about a mechanical second away, which again makes logical sense considering gravitational waves inertia being the same as “light speed”, and the distance between earth and the moon, about a second.
The correlation as well fits the idea that mars is the solar backslap in a terra centric but gravitational dominated solar system, so to say. https://image.nostr.build/526ab8fd724bcb55b633481d791d17005979f74718ecf6e2c16684ab72c7dba9.jpg  
 Let’s also not forget, that the clock is not ticking the same rate everywhere.

Dilating in correlation to gravitational effects of time.

I’m not a scientist, nor a physicist nor a mathematician to present a scientific method on this thesis, but happy to discuss the logical reasoning nonetheless. 
 All which requires organic brains to produce. 
 Or organic life at least 
 Something is for sure, a clock on earth doesn’t really represent anything but the day’s progress.

Not the same as a Uranus clock

https://youtu.be/kWp6hZ-5ndc?si=A-qzXHkrlpTk61gb