It’s $900T not $454T. 50% is the most logical answer, half of every tx is money, half is not money. Personally, I think higher than 50% because of all the margin leverage (debt). Don’t forget to add in a multiplier effect to the price (really purchasing power), e.g. 50% means 2x, 66% means 3x, and so on.

Disregard people who gotcha with printer go brr and global wealth increasing 🥴. I get them every time. The only metric that matters is % of total wealth. https://image.nostr.build/1f6e64bf6aff83c577ef3ee630abd79586ec469ea77897415ec2a2d6cf7f2cc7.jpg  

 This disagrees with your $900T figure.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/global-wealth-distribution/

Everything else is opinion which I won’t argue with. 

 Well, it’s wrong. Do some more research. 

 No. 

 Have fun indulging in ignorance. Bold strategy. 

 We are all ignorant, except the experts, who know even less. 

 Saylor agrees with $900T. This is not my first rodeo, I’ve had this exact exchange countless times. If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry. https://image.nostr.build/74fbb4763a6839e3f26140bed2c1d7dbdd5e9946d3fceaa87a2c4dda3fca8534.jpg  

 I have no interest in debating a moot point of global wealth, but I would urge you to avoid false prophets.  

DYOR was good advice which I chose to ignore. 

Telling me you’re right because somebody else said so is not good advice or a good philosophy to follow.

Don’t follow my advice or listen to me, follow your own advice and DYOR and loose your ego. 

I don’t care if you’re right or wrong, neither should you. 

 Have fun navigating the Cartesian Crisis with postmodernism. 

 Thank you fren, you too.