My main focus has been on providing a self sovereign failsafe for lost nostr keys, and my reason for using the ord name instead or number was because it’s shorter. Readability of handles didn’t matter to me as much. I consider it more in the sense of a ‘telephone number’ made up with letters, for which you could maintain a personal ‘phonebook’ and just name things what you want for your reference, but you never need to look at the ‘phone number’ to get to the person or website you want. 

I see the value in naming though and in vanity names. I don’t expect the ord names to become suddenly popular and the availability of names people actually want is a real problem. But I absolutely don’t want to introduce a third party authority into it. That’s a hard pass. 

 agreed on 3rd party authorities being a hard pass. the only way such a thing could work would be if it was neutral 

 In the end it’s possible that the names don’t even matter. For the lookup to work you need a static identifier to which you can associate new ips and new certs. Maybe we can live without the global naming, since we use search engines, social media posts, adds, and qr codes to get where we want to go. 

 Wow, I was spectacularly unclear 🙈 I meant to say that the static identifier can as well be a satoshi name even if it’s a mostly random mix of letters and the websites and users can then name themselves whatever they want.