So, your saying, it isn't because you refused to help with the housework more?
Sort of counters her point. 

 In this house, there no "refuse to help". We don't builshit each other.  

 The point being that her positive personal situation hasn't made your wife suddenly more eager to reproduce. If she wanted kids, she'll want them, regardless. If not, then not.

The OP is not supported by demographic studies. 

 No, the point is that after a decision is made (to not have kids - for any reason, preference or economic/career) everybody else feels the need to put pressure and change that without offering any significant advantages to the woman. Governments, family, society, nostr, etc.  

 I live in a country that bends over backward to parents in general, and even more so for women. Has no effect, other than to encourage fertile foreign women to move here and mooch. 

People who don't breed go extinct. That is not my problem or my responsibility; it's evolution. 

 Agreed. 

 The babies are like 99 to 1 advantage to women ..  economically , socially , and emotionally ..   

 O arrependimento  futuro é mais forte q a decisão atual...  

 Sounds like a shitty future. Id rather have a human centric one.  

 Exactly the reason for having babies  .. that is the most sophisticated AI :-)  

A human brain has 1000 x more parameters  (synases) than chatGPT3 right at the birth !  To run such a model on silicon , you would probably need more power than entire bitcoin network ..  

 Legit all we need is free markets with Bitcoin as the monetary layer. AI is just a neat bonus, and should never be in charge any more than humans.