Not really. All the proper Bitcoin economists I can think of have exposure to other stuff.
Then they aren't Bitcoin-only, tho. Also have to be careful that Bitcoin businesses are not a diversification away from Bitcoin.
Here are economists (and financial analysts) I still find interesting because they add information: Mark Friedrich Peter Schiff Lynn Alden Dr. Daniel Stelter Jeff Snyder Deffner and Zschäpitz Sarah Wagenknecht
never been able to understand what Snyder is talking about. Tried to follow a few times but never could grasp what he was really saying
He talks way too fast and gives little background info.
eurodollar babble, literally no idea how it tied to anything or what actionable info he was trying to convey. Opposite of Lyn Alden who is a plain spoken clear thinker. Anyone can understand her.
Peter Schiff? he keeps making bad predictions about bitcoin so what else is he getting wrong?
So you find wagenknecht interesting... Me too
She's amazing. Often wrong, but fascinating and brilliant.
I like the old classic view and the different to classic apprach of migration, if i understand correctly