Oddbean new post about login | logout Wikifreedia 0.0.3 released! MERGE SUPPORT! https://i.makeagif.com/media/4-12-2017/KnAPRl.gif Now you can easily fork someone's wiki entry and, if you want them to take your changes, ask to merge them in. I explain it more thoroughly in this video with a *special* silent guest in the background. In the video Alice writes an article and White Rabbit makes a new version with some changes and gets Alice to update her copy with these changes. White Rabbit. satisfied with these new changes, deletes his version and signals to his followers that he agrees with Alice's version. https://flare-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/u/fa984bd7dbb282f07e16e7ae87b26a2a7b9b90b7246a44771f0cf5ae58018f52/video/mqm3-wlmqxu-9GW2nk5pg.mp4
Could there be an archive for different versions even if the changes are approved; with the differences in each one highlighted?!
yes, I'm waiting for a change in the protocol because we're making this better throughout all event kinds (so no more losing your follow list or other such things) once we have that at the protocol I'll add revision history 😀
Thank you... zapped. Will it still be 'supported by' White Rabbit after the pull request is merged if post-edits have been made by Alice?
was http://fed.wiki your inspiration?
This has the potential to be huge. This protocol and the work done on it impresses me constantly nostr:nevent1qqs8a2ty78xfv9454wj2ft4jwee3ravsg4v5fmttkqhkask9hgukdsgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqyg86np9a0kajstc8u9h846rmy6320wdepdeydfz8w8cv7kh9sqv02gpsgqqqqqqs842dtt
best App on Nostr nostr:note1065kfuwvjcttf2ay5jhtyannz86eq32egnkkhvp0dmpvtw3evmqsyphz44
very cool! When White Rabbit suggested the additional text, Alice had the opportunity to edit his suggestion. If she were to do that, does White Rabbit have the opportunity to see the edits and possibly withdraw his support for the merge?
Over a year ago now I asked @Gigi on stacker news why Wikipedia is seemingly struggling with the “Value for Value” model. He provided a thoughtful response here: https://stacker.news/items/98781/r/Lemon?commentId=99064 In that reply he offered “programmatic V4V splits” as a reward mechanism for posts on Wikipedia. I think this is the project he had in mind. Please look into adding zaps so we can reward people for their research efforts into the articles they write. And consider adding splits for co-authors/merges. Keep crushing 👊
I can confirm this works well. My only regret is not drawing a picture of a penis for Alice and asking for pics of bobs and vagene.
@gsovereignty lookin sexy
hahahhahaha I cant, only @Vitor Pamplona can but I doubt he wants to 😂😂😂 https://wikifreedia.xyz/amethyst/5be6446aa8a31c11b3
Actually I can't do it as well. The page stays loading forever. https://wikifreedia.xyz/pr/naddr1qqyxzmt9w358jum5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzyprqcf0xst760qet2tglytfay2e3wmvh9asdehpjztkceyh0s5r9cqcyqqq8scs3x379n/a0a40295360cd0224bebad3092801418aa0d2f14d181ab05e809e647ebcec73b
ah, looks like Tony modified it again *after* sending the merge request; I am e-tagging the version that is being requested to be merged to be very explicit, but the tagged event id is no longer available on the relays I guess I'll have to a tag it instead; I liked the idea of tagging the exact version that was requested 😅 (or maybe I could just stringify the event into the merge request, 🤔)
ah, looks like Tony modified it again *after* sending the merge request; I am e-tagging the version that is being requested to be merged to be very explicit, but the tagged event id is no longer available on the relays I guess I'll have to a tag it instead; I liked the idea of tagging the exact version that was requested 😅 (or maybe I could just stringify the event into the merge request, 🤔)
