Oddbean new post about | logout
 So basically everything that’s below 500k sats is dust anyways in the future. Long term holdings should at least be 1M. Thanks for sharing 
 There might be use cases down the road that will help smaller utxos, but I don't feel like exploring those. So I feel it's easier to plan now 
 Nonsense 
 Well, care to explain why it’s nonsense? Or just trolling? 
 Since when are fees going to be permanently so high that a 500k utxo is dust? It sounds like fear mongering. Consolidating, especially of mixed utxo's, is a very poor privacy practice. 
 Well, there is an argument to be made that tx fees will be higher in the future permanently. Nobody knows but for me it makes sense as corporations and nation states start to use it on a regular basis, that tx fees will never come down to levels we are used to now.
As for your privacy concern, you can mix 1m sats sized UTXOs in Whirlpool. So I don’t understand your point. 
 Tx fees going up forever is a big blockers argument, and considered inevitable by many with a shitcoin mindset, because the fees (and other proposed ways to reward miners) have to offset declining block rewards. But, has permanent rising fees played out as block size went from 50 to 6.25? No, it has not, you can still get low fees, although it has been harder lately due to unsustainable shenanigans the latest of which being ordinal graffiti. And the reason fees won't inevitably rise is because the value of bitcoin rises. 
 I mean, you could be right. Your argument of increased price makes sense. I still can see a future where 500sat/vB is permanent. If 50% of the world will want to use Bitcoin, block space will just be too scarce for prices to stay as low as they are. People will have to open and close channels to LN all the time. But we’ll see 
 100% of the world will use bitcoin and it could cost hundreds of dollars equivalent to move a utxo on the base layer, like take it to the extreme where one sat is worth one of today's dollars. Practically speaking only whales (owning >= 1 whole coin) and layer 3's like fedi's move coin on the base layer to service their lightning nodes. 
 There you go. You just said it yourself: 500k sats will be dust.
I don’t believe that only whole coiner will be able to transact on-chain. I think 1m sats will always be economically viable. 
 ?? In that hypothetical, 500k sats would be the equivalent of half a million today's dollars 
 You said only whole coiner and L3s will be able to make on-chain txs. That implies that 500k sats are dust. 
 “Transaction fees going up forever” is different than “fees will be higher in the future permanently”.

The former is false, the later is likely true.

500k sats is unlikely to be operative dust, but it could cost a very high percentage of itself in fees to be moved.

You can read the article where that chart came from, and the math behind it, here:

https://unchained.com/blog/small-utxo-bitcoin-dust/