"Sex work is work" as in, "the prostitute has the right to sell sex" is the wrong approach to take as it completely ignores who is buying. Whether the woman finds pleasure in selling sex, whether she should have the right to "decide for herself" is irrelevant when considering the fact that every sex buyer is essentially a rapist. How can it be work when there are no "valid" customers?
Places like Massachusetts and California were making this move in the name of equity. These districts were observing that advanced courses tended to be dominated by white and Asian students
that’s like legalizing crime so there’s no more crime?
Who's strong and weak here? Women cannot escape these risks no matter how "strong" they are, though wealth helps. Men aren't having anything taken away, they're simply being made to face consequences they usually escape.
Why shouldn't child support be unfair to men? When a woman starts dating, she risks much more than she should, and more than a man will ever risk when dating. Stalking, harassment, rape, domestic abuse, violence, death, unwanted pregnancy by force or coercion, myriad of lifelong changes and health problems from that pregnancy, responsibility, entire lifestyle changes ...
It is only fair that men "risk" $50 a month.
They used to ask me "why" whenever I said no.. and wtf am I supposed to say to that? What are you expecting my dude? I always told them, "just because."
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by kijo 破邪顕正 | export