Point taken, Gary wouldn’t like to be in a position to continue to loose lawsuits as head of the SEC. But what’s the incentive for the SEC/US Government to allow bitcoin to increase liquidity and institutional adoption? 

 1) I am pressed to ask you for evidence on your affirmation that every time the SEC acted on the benefit of the US government they got sued and lost.

2) Comparing the SEC to DMV regulations is a stretch. Yes theoretically both should regulate without providing benefits to any particular group or person. However, regulators decisions taken by agencies such as the SEC, create financial consequences far more impactful than whatever DMV action can do in regards of whether they want to help US Gov or not. 

 Hopefully he’s boots on the ground in Argentina making headways into Milei’s team! 

 This is awesome! Thanks 

 Can someone tell me which is the incentive for Gary to approve them?