Oddbean new post about | logout

Notes by 2f058430 | export

 XCOM: Terror from the Deep is basically the same game as XCOM: Enemy Unknown, only much harder and with different graphics and assets. They clearly didn't want to mess with a winning formula when they made the sequel. But, like, it's really hard. I very seldom survive past my first few missions before giving in up frustration.

And yet... I prefer it. It's better, somehow. The underwater aspect, starting with those retro diving suits that your aquanauts wear into battle, the coral reefs and cthulu-esque monsters... I guess I've always liked the aesthetic of nautical horror, with the ships and the mysterious depths and all that.

#DosGames #RetroGaming 
 So I have a question about the current sweeping AI trend. We keep hearing about how much water it needs to cool all those enormous new data centres. Why does it need so much compute?

I mean, creating  the models is pretty hardcore, but once it's done it's done. They aren't running a supercomputer for each individual chatgpt session, you can run it yourself on a reasonably beefy home PC. Creating the model is where the real work is, but once it's done you can just download it to your PC when you need it.

Right? Wrong?

The previous Big Sexy was blockchain. That was also a big data centre bad guy, only then we worried about how much carbon was being released to generate all the electricity they used. We got stories about how secret blockchain mining bunkers were using half a nearby town's electricity supply, but this iteration we don't mention that at all because it's all about the water.

And there's no push-back. No press releases about how the water cooling system at the new datacentre is actually fine because the water is returned to the system, or it's closed-cycle so they fill up a reservoir once and never take another drop of our water, or they only use undrinkable grey water or something. Or challenging the claims about how much water is being used.

So who is spinning these stories? Is there a PR agency somewhere being paid to ensure we don't blame the Microsofts and Metas of the world for global heating, and that's why we're griping about water instead? 
 I may be in the minority here, but I don't like the trend of having episode art that's different ... 
 @bb052609 No no, I agree completely. I know when I publish episodes, I individualise cover art for episodes in the web view, but keep it constant in the RSS feed, for exactly this reason. So people finding an episode by google on the show website, or who subscribed by email or something, get to see the covert art (usually a nice photo of the person I'm interviewing). But in your podcasting app, where my episodes are mixed up with all your other subscriptions, you see the show logo.