Oddbean new post about | logout
 Long read, philosophers welcome, tl;dr-seekers beware 😉


I’ve been thinking deeply today about the concept of action: of freely manifesting the next instance of reality. This concept takes many forms, but today I’m looking at it in the context of speech and Bitcoin/cryptographic sovereignty…



*Running your own node fulfills the direct peer-to-peer nature of Bitcoin’s original state* 


So. It’s easy to understand the practical case for running a Bitcoin node, with benefits like the ability to verify your coins and improved privacy.

But there’s also a philosophical consideration that I’ve been mulling over… and I’d love others’ input.

When running a node, you not only verify and sign transactions; you also broadcast them to the network, where another node (peer) can pick up the electrons (loosely described). 

If you use your wallet provider’s node, you depend on them to communicate your desired transaction with your trade partner. By using another entity’s node, you sacrifice the pure peer-to-peer nature of the Bitcoin network.

Likewise, by running your own node and freely broadcasting your own transaction to your peer, you take full control of (and responsibility for) your action and its effect. 

This isn’t to suggest that “you must run node to be good bitcoiner” or some nonsense like that (although it’s self-evident that running a node is usually good). Most of us still depend on internet and electric companies to achieve any of this stuff.

I’m moreso contemplating different setups and permutations of sovereignty.

There’s something beautiful about the process of communicating your intended transfer of value on your own terms, permission-less-ly, rather than asking a service provider to communicate it for you.

So, I’m coming to view it more as an expression of the principle of freedom of speech. 

We know the code-is-speech case, but that’s a little different. As I understand it, it means that freedom of expression includes the math and language of code, such that code is included among in the types of speech to which we have a right.

On the other hand, I’m thinking about the moment of broadcasting a transaction from your own node. 

Taking this action is exercising the freedom *to* speak, to express your intention of transferring value.

To broadcast a Bitcoin transaction, from your own node, is to declare your participation in this global network of near-perfect consensus. 

I can’t quite put my finger on it, but there is something profound about that moment of action, of doing, of “is-ness”, of the truth and reality of manifesting action in the present moment.

Of course, grokking this profound experience is not constrained to Bitcoin transactions — the beauty of being/doing exists everywhere — but I’m struck today by the freeness of action, and how that action is itself an expression of the right to speak and to assemble.

There’s something exceptional about action - generation, manifestation, creation. When the freedom to speak is overlaid on the significance of action, then the choice to run your own node, and to broadcast your transaction directly to the network of your peers takes on a deeper significance and value.

Thanks for reading 🫂🧡 

#plebchain #showerthoughts #grownostr #philosophy 
 Nicely said! I’ve got to know what exact wine you had whilst you philosophized about all that! 😂😂 ..no really what was it?? 
 damn…u put some thought into this bro
whereas im just over here not wanting people to fck w my shit 
 🫂🫂 that is an entirely acceptable approach my friend 
 Why not go a step further and run decentralized dns with #pubkey

- #nostr is tens of nodes
- #bitcoin is thousands of nodes
- #pubky is million of nodes 
 The manifestation/creation and expression of your thoughts going into that note is just as interesting to me as where the decision came from for the actions you’re taking towards sovereignty. 

Lately I can’t stop considering the reasons why we do anything. 
Is that moment of “is-ness”, truth and manifestation something you have “decided” to make happen? Or are you just experiencing it? Isn’t it just a result of every experience you’ve ever had? Most of which are a consequence of events that are downstream of dominoed moments from before you are born? 

Through that lens I see bitcoin as something even more beautiful. It’s a result of everything that came before it. A result of all the tyranny, suffering and devastation in history which bitcoin aims to overcome. Are all the bad things the only reason we can have bitcoin? This isn’t original obviously, this concept of good and evil toying with each other and reality being manifest outside of our will is where every religion comes from. 

To be seeing the potential for such a huge shift in society, right before our eyes, as a reaction to so many negatives in history. I’m so grateful for this. 
 This is beautifully put — I think often about the interplay between choice and “karma” (in reference to fhe interdependent lines of cause and effect, rather than the personalized caricature of karma).

If everything is part of an energetic whole, and our consciousness too is a part of it, then every instance of being is simultaneously chosen and determined/dependent on the prior moment, with no paradox. Panentheism in philosophy, unified field theory in physics, “it’s/we’re all one” in meditation (and psychedelics)… the duality is complete, and the paradoxical views are consistent with one another (a paradox within itself), and it’s an absolutely beautiful thing to contemplate.

Thanks for your reply; thanks for being here 🫂