Do you still consider the anti-GMO campaign against McDonald's a good thing? It prevented people from enjoying cheaper prices! If it resulted in government actions against GMOs, it constituted aggression against peaceful individuals and violated the non-aggression principle. The freedom of association of GMO producers and consumers is infringed upon by outsiders who believe GMOs are harmful.
GMO producers like Cargill and Bayer (formerly Monsanto)? Like cheaper glyphosate berries? Peaceful individuals that sued a farmer out of business because a patented seed blew into his field and grew, without that farmer paying for the license to grow? non- aggression principle is out of context here, contrarily.
This nostr:nevent1qqspxutz89f7vkjenu5unuh3whl8x5zx64h6txldxghesayufc5te5gpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqzyrryqgf9ay8gy7f0tqqq8wlcrgfsh2e9gr24xvcu2q6l7zryukj5kqcyqqqqqqgttz4pj