I don’t think you’re grokking the argument that population decline is a political matter and that outlawing murder is something that already exists. It just needs to be applied to humans in the womb in every state. People don’t have the right (or at least shouldn’t) to kill others in private, specially their own children.

It’s bizarre you’re more preoccupied about a supposed use of your tax dollars to monitor women 24/7, which no one is suggesting by the way, than the destruction of millions of humans lives. “Yeah I hear you about the millions of babies that were killed in the womb, but the real atrocity is the government using tax dollars trying to stop that from happening” same vibes

A tax break is not paying people presumably with tax money to have kids. Again, completely misunderstanding the argument. 

I imagine you think politics don’t matter anyway, so this conversation is pointless.

Good day, sir 

 I understand that a government taking action requires using force against non consenting non violent people.

You are ok with using violence to get your way with non violent people or refuse to understand that is what you are doing. I am not.