For my friends with ADD. 

SkimmableGPT Summary: 
Evolution and Challenges of Nostr Key Management

Key Problem:
•	Pasting nsec keys into apps is insecure, exposing users to numerous risks (e.g., clipboard hijacking, bugs, insecure channels).
•	The industry must prioritize secure, user-friendly key management solutions to ensure broader adoption.

Key Management Approaches:
1.	Extension Signers:
•	Convenient for browser-based Nostr use.
•	Lacks cross-device portability (desktop to mobile).
2.	Hardware Signers:
•	Highly secure but impractical for most users due to complexity and hardware requirements.
3.	Hosted Signers:
•	User-friendly but custodial, increasing risks of centralized key theft or compromise.
4.	Desktop Signers:
•	Expands usability to desktop apps but lacks portability for multi-device users.
5.	Mobile Signers:
•	Offers flexibility and accessibility but underdeveloped for iOS.
6.	Web Signers:
•	Balances convenience and non-custodial principles but faces platform limitations (e.g., iOS).
7.	Multisig Signers:
•	Promising for security but increases complexity and latency.
8.	Self-Hosted Signers:
•	Best for tech-savvy users with self-hosting expertise.
9.	Omniplatform Signers:
•	A unified, cross-platform approach ideal for simplifying onboarding.

Challenges with NIP 46 (Nostr Connect):
•	Complex and evolving specification creates app incompatibilities.
•	Latency and UX issues hinder smooth operation.
•	Lack of a unified cross-platform experience for signing.
•	Absence of signer apps in mainstream app stores limits accessibility.

Path Forward:
•	Standardize secure, user-friendly solutions like NIP 46 and progressively enhance user experience.
•	Focus on minimizing attack vectors and promoting a single, easily accessible non-custodial signer for new users.
•	Encourage mainstream app support and push notification integration to reduce friction for non-technical users.

The goal is to balance security and usability while making Nostr adoption feasible for everyday users.