the 5 year cycle which began in 2020 will not conclude until inauguration of the next president january 2025. for perspective, it takes about the same length of time for initiates to find themselves in a legal situation which creates some sort of ethics violation. this summer will be worse than 2021/22. you will see an uptick in bounty interest, in curiosity, in hacking, in public displays of unstable behavior. in person relationships will be mostly centered around collections.
be aware, not afraid.
remember: most operate in the black market because they cannot operate above board. refuse to be held hostage.
blackmail bait dies instantly when you tell the truth. and then you have proof of blackmail.
"get out of my way".
i encourage the zionist to brush up on their old testament with regards to permissive invasion - because from a trust stance: no digital warrant in the world will break the source code of textual truth.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%2028%3A43-68&version=NIV
when christian nationalists and digital zionists front bitcoin as an ideology, they easily forget and like to dismiss judaism as their predecessors. it matters because the profound irony of proof of work in torah as half the christian bible ( and most christians enjoy citing the old testament for their moralist agendas) in the overlay of blockchain pow should be a reality every bitcoiner should need to confront in public discourse. to believe in the concept of work, you must respect the source of your ideology - which is borrowed from another religion.
one cannot justifiably be in simultaneous favor of protecting work and stealing work, documentation and erasure of archives. one cannot believe in supremacy of christianity without the acknowledgement of judaic agency - unless you advocate for the erasure of those who predated your ideology. which is unchristian. and thus concludes the rhetorical debate about zionism in all of its forms as anything other than a political front -
mandating digital invasion through legal channels of any sort is unethical by scriptural standards and thus breaches trust -
the 4th amendment is the only footing for search and seizure legality and according to ethics of common law: consciousness or "open ocean" is protected space and does not fall under the same jurisdiction.