Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
0941ab9a | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @e9fa40a2 @5f9be9ad Fixed that for you

https://cdn.masto.host/astrodonsocial/media_attachments/files/111/136/760/649/111/436/original/d1c672244c43a163.png
▲ ▼
Dr. Alexandre Santerne 🌍 | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @7f5dfb68 @5f9be9ad I like this one too...

https://cdn.masto.host/astrodonsocial/media_attachments/files/111/136/769/439/004/043/original/1eaf5a13aa3bd8b9.png
▲ ▼
0941ab9a | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @e9fa40a2 Voila !
▲ ▼
461dad2f | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @e9fa40a2 @7f5dfb68 @5f9be9ad Frankly, since I see hundreds of aspiring scientists send papers to my journal, hoping for some form of solidarity from their peers (called "review"), I do not see this diagram as particularly helpful. Sometimes we do things because others need us to do them.
▲ ▼
Dr. Alexandre Santerne 🌍 | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @4fbb756c @7f5dfb68 @5f9be9ad I fully agree this decision tree is a bit selfish. Review is clearly an issue in this flow chart, but that's another debate (related to incremental papers, etc...).