Analogy is spot on.

What does it matter what they choose to put in a block?  

Let the other miners put in what they want.

If they get big and people don't like it hopefully more pools that decentralize mining pop up like OCEAN and they put what they want in their blocks.

Not really understanding the hate against what they are doing if you are truly for a stronger bitcoin with decentralized mining. 

 Chill. Lol. Not comparable at all. How rediculous.  

 You realize you have 2 options.
Better competing product or convince enough people that it’s censorship and not free market choice to do so. And do so in a way that doesn’t use personal attacks as we have seen from others in the past 

 Based on discussion about it and not actually having looked at the code yet, it gives more control to the individual, something you should be for given your values.  

If the premise is true, that an individual nodes carry limit can be ignored, this is forced association.

The size can also be adjusted back to the larger, inscription accepting size.

Basing my conclusion on this:

nostr:nevent1qqs2fpcdf0f73vypysyeywhrpdnek0sqxstprhvcvl0dtpwmf84xxvspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsyg8a6h50dtsdhqtmuzm3mgsynrqcq6tgmznyt92ecfylxgh6wdry5upsgqqqqqqstupe6q 

 There's no "let it happen" or "don't let it happen" in Bitcoin. Luke can do what he wants with the blocks his pool mines, and anyone who disagrees with him won't mine on his pool.

As long as there is a substantial amount of miners willing to include Ordinals in blocks, then there is no way to ACTUALLY censor them. So far, it is looking like that will be the case for the foreseeable future, since OCEAN is the only option for taking a firm stance against including Ordinals and yet they haven't attracted even 1% of the hashrate.

It's the same thing with OFAC sanctioned transactions. As long as there's a substantial amount of hashrate out there that won't exclude them, they will make it into a block.