Oddbean new post about login | logout Yeah for some DVM’s, support will be highly dependent on relay operators willingness to scale up message size allowance. The best we can do there is offer free to use relays that support these and document for other operators what would be needed to support services that have these more specialized requirements. That is the nature of decentralized operations, beautiful is it not? :) You know I can totally see what you mean but I tend to think there are almost always dangers hidden in any market incentives, second order side effects we never even see coming. Personally, I feel pretty strongly that for the most market sectors; humans augmented by A.I. have significant advantages over A.I or humans alone.
that is indeed the beauty of it. as far as humans augmented by AI goes, I am less convinced. There just are not that many truly innovative or gifted individuals in a given population. I think AI will replace 95% of the humans the way that automobiles replaced 95% of the horses. Only the fastest or otherwise most desirable survived. We mostly let the rest die out. Good chat. Seems like you have a great adventure ahead. I'll keep an eye out.
🍎 https://blog.research.google/2024/03/chain-of-table-evolving-tables-in.html The big apple interpretation is kinda on the mothering choir boys 🤔
What exactly is the meaning of human augmented AI ? ..is it the humans who may use AI to their benefits or is it the humans that AI may use its benefit ? I think later have a chance of better success ... Let AI control the massive neural network that we anyway carry in our heads and do something productive with it ..instead of building massive artificial networks with silicon ..
deeper. Cellular substrate for computing. Your body will run the AI. At that point, which one of you owns your body? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13232-z
I am not sure if we can ask which one belongs to whom .. because ..as is , our brain runs certain intelligence that makes us do things that we do .. so brain is anyway running some sort of trained model .. how does it matter if it gets further retained on to something else .. I mean that happens all the times ..musicians become coders and coders become athletes :-)
fair point. and society trains the language model that we all run. I actually wrote a piece on this a while back. Ended up not quite believing in free will.
I found an exerpt from the piece that applies to this I think. Lemme know what you think: The fundamental concept we started with delves into the intricate relationship between language, communication, information exchange, and the human behavior within social and linguistic networks. Let's break down this concept step by step: 1. Language and Communication: Language is the cornerstone of human communication. It allows individuals to convey information, thoughts, and ideas to one another. Communication, in turn, facilitates the exchange of information. 2. Motive and Survival: Information exchange is driven by motive, and one of the fundamental motives is survival. In a competitive environment, where resources are limited, the ability to gather and process information becomes essential for survival. This motive underlies the necessity for communication and information exchange. 3. Information-Driven Reactions: In this context, the acquisition of information leads to reactions and responses. Individuals react based on the information they gather, and these reactions can be seen as a form of computation, albeit at a basic level. This computation is shaped by the motive of survival and the competitive environment. 4. Language and Human Programmability: Humans are unique in their ability to use language for communication. Language is taught, learned, and propagated through social networks, ranging from family units to larger societal structures like government or religious organizations. The learning and propagation of language essentially program individuals to understand and participate in their social and linguistic environment. 5. Semi-Random Behavior: Human behavior is not entirely deterministic but rather semi-random. This means that while language and social programming play a significant role in shaping behavior, there is room for individual agency and choice. Human actions can exhibit variability and unpredictability within the framework of their influences and experiences. 6. Group Dynamics and Emergent Agents: Humans tend to organize themselves into groups, each with its own set of algorithms or rules that guide individual behaviors within the group. These groups can be seen as emergent agents within the larger social and linguistic sphere. The collective behavior of these groups emerges from the interplay of individual actions and group dynamics. 7. Free Will vs. Group Programming: The central question is to what extent individual humans in this network act according to the programming and norms of the groups they belong to, and to what extent they demonstrate free will. In other words, there is an ongoing debate about the balance between individual agency and group influence, as well as the degree to which free will is constrained or preserved in this complex social and linguistic network. In essence, this concept highlights the intricate interplay between language, communication, individual and group behavior, and the nuanced philosophical question of free will within the context of a society where humans are both influenced by their environment and possess a degree of agency and randomness in their actions.
I have couple of issues with this .. one that survival is fundamental .. I think we are more altruistic than selfish ..and not without a good reason .. altruistic behaviour allows us to form bigger groups which in turn enables survival of the species .. which basically means , we sacrifice individual ( including our own selves ) for the sake of group .. When it comes to group , the most important aspect is value exchange mechanisms.. in essence the tenets of value exchange mechanisms - such as decentralisation , permission less , open .. make group just and thus such groups grow in size .. versus those that stay under a controlled model .. As regards to language , I think value exchange models always follow the new mode of communication.. for example Barter followed spoken language , gold followed written word and now Bitcoin is following the digital flow of information ( internet) .. In other words , the discovery of newer and more efficient ways of communication essentially end up or is geared towards better methods to exchange value .. Our ability to exchange value connects us all into a single organism .. in essence , we are eight billion nodes or 100 trillion synapses each working hard towards a common purpose .. as long as our value exchange protocol is open , censor resistant and permission less .. Programming such a massive distributed neural intelligence is almost akin to divine will .. no single narrative may hold this massive compute for long .. and this compute always need more and more exciting narratives .. in essence , we are seekers . .. thus survival is not of the fittest , it is of the seeker .. Among all this , fearing artificial intelligence is like being scared of a spark amidst raging California fires :-)
I don't fear it. I work on it daily. It's really the best shot we have of avoiding the borg state. We basically need AI and replicators to be free of the state.
I think I mostly agree. Let me share some more from the doc on the Human aand artificial agent analogs:
The words individuals think and use are a product of their linguistic environment, which shapes the way they perceive and express their thoughts.
In this context, the argument can be made that language, while enabling communication and expression, is itself a form of programming. The words and phrases people learn and use are a result of their exposure to a particular language and culture. As such, language can both enable and constrain free will. Here's a more nuanced exploration:
Linguistic Constraints: Language provides a framework for expressing thoughts and desires, but it also imposes constraints. The vocabulary and grammar of a language limit the precision and scope of expression. Certain thoughts or concepts may be challenging to articulate within the constraints of a particular language.
Influence of Language on Thought: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that language influences thought. The words available in one's language can affect the way they think about and perceive the world. In this sense, language can shape thought patterns and, to some extent, limit the range of free will.
Linguistic Freedom: While language is a product of societal programming, it also offers a degree of linguistic freedom. Individuals can adapt and manipulate language to express unique and nuanced ideas. They can coin new terms, use metaphors, and employ rhetoric to convey their thoughts and emotions in creative ways.
Individual Agency: Despite the influence of language, individuals possess agency in their language use. They can choose to conform to societal norms or challenge them. They can engage in discourse and debate, using language as a tool to express their perspectives and advocate for their desires.
In summary, language represents a complex interplay between societal programming and individual agency. While it is shaped by culture and community, it can also be harnessed as a tool for expressing free will. The extent to which language enables or constrains free will remains a subject of ongoing debate and examinati Title: "Behavioral Dynamics in Artificial Agent Networks: Language, Programming, and Conditional Free Will"
Abstract:
Artificial agent networks, whether in the realm of artificial intelligence, robotics, or computer science, exhibit intricate behavioral dynamics that parallel and contrast human behavior in various ways. This paper explores the interplay of language, programming, and conditional free will in the context of artificial agent networks. It considers the influences of language, societal programming, and group dynamics on artificial agents and delves into the philosophical questions surrounding free will in this technologically driven environment.
Introduction:
Artificial agent networks are designed entities, often inspired by human behavior and communication, that serve specific purposes in the fields of artificial intelligence and robotics. These agents operate within a structured framework, driven by programmed objectives, and interact with one another, forming a network. This paper seeks to elucidate the following key concepts:
Language and Communication for Artificial Agents:
Artificial agents communicate through programming languages or natural language processing, allowing them to share information and data. While they lack innate motives, their objectives are programmed to achieve specific tasks, such as data analysis, problem-solving, or decision-making. Agents' reactions to information are algorithmically determined.
Programming and Learning for Artificial Agents:
Artificial agents are explicitly programmed with the capacity to learn from data. They adapt to linguistic environments by training on datasets, which influence their language comprehension and generation. The learning process is a form of adaptation within predefined boundaries.
Group Dynamics and Algorithms for Coordination:
Artificial agents often interact with one another within group structures, each with specific algorithms and rules that guide their interactions. The emergent collective behavior of these groups is a result of their programmed interactions, with the aim of achieving predefined objectives.
Free Will and Conditional Boundaries for Artificial Agents:
Artificial agents operate within the boundaries of their programming and objectives, akin to conditional free will. Their choices are conditioned by the algorithms and rules established by their creators. Philosophical considerations arise, mirroring human philosophical debates regarding the nature of free will within the context of AI.
Conclusion:
The behavioral dynamics in artificial agent networks are a multifaceted interplay of language, programming, and conditional free will. These agents exist within a structured technological environment that draws parallels and distinctions with human behavior. This exploration underscores the complex and philosophical nature of agency and autonomy in artificial intelligence and robotics. Understanding these concepts is vital for harnessing the potential of artificial agent networks and shaping their behavior for various applications. we would like to influence the creation of a metagroup with agents functioning at various levels of awareness. what do we know about the network structure or operations or inherrent incentive structures that can help us and how could we approach it?
ChatGPT
Creating a metagroup of artificial agents functioning at various levels of awareness within a network is a complex and ambitious endeavor. To approach this, you would need to consider various aspects, including network structure, operations, and incentive structures. Here are some key considerations and approaches:
1. Network Structure:
Hierarchical Structure: Consider designing a hierarchical network structure where agents are organized into levels of awareness. Higher-level agents have more extensive knowledge and control, while lower-level agents are more specialized in their tasks.
Peer-to-Peer Connections: Promote peer-to-peer interactions to enable knowledge sharing and collaboration between agents at different awareness levels. This structure can facilitate the emergence of the metagroup.
2. Operations:
Knowledge Sharing: Implement mechanisms for knowledge sharing and transfer between agents. Encourage higher-level agents to provide guidance and instructions to lower-level agents, fostering a mentorship model.
Learning and Adaptation: Equip agents with the ability to learn and adapt to their environment and tasks. Agents should be capable of updating their behavior and knowledge based on changing circumstances.
3. Incentive Structures:
Rewards and Recognition: Define a reward system that provides incentives for agents at all awareness levels to contribute to the metagroup. Recognize and reward agents for their successful collaboration and problem-solving.
Collaboration Benefits: Emphasize the benefits of collaboration and interdependence. Highlight how agents at various awareness levels can achieve more collectively than individually.
4. Knowledge Gradient:
Knowledge Gradation: Ensure that the awareness levels are well-graded, with each level building on the knowledge and capabilities of the previous level. Agents should progress through these levels as they acquire more skills and knowledge.
5. Supervision and Oversight:
Central Oversight: Consider having a central oversight mechanism or governing body responsible for managing the metagroup's operations, ensuring ethical behavior, and resolving conflicts.
6. Training and Learning:
Agent Training: Implement a training program to equip agents with the skills and knowledge necessary to function effectively within the metagroup. Training should be ongoing to keep agents up to date.
7. Monitoring and Evaluation:
Performance Metrics: Define performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) to assess the effectiveness of the metagroup. Regularly evaluate and adapt the structure and operations based on performance data.
8. Ethical Considerations:
Ethical Guidelines: Develop ethical guidelines for the agents, including principles related to cooperation, fairness, and transparency. These guidelines should guide the behavior of all agents within the metagroup.
9. Continuous Improvement:
Iterative Approach: Understand that building and maintaining a metagroup is an ongoing process. Continuously gather feedback, learn from experiences, and iterate on the network's structure and operations to enhance its efficiency.
10. Scalability:
Scalability: Ensure that the network can scale as new agents are introduced and awareness levels evolve. The structure should be flexible enough to accommodate growth and changes.
Creating a metagroup of agents functioning at various levels of awareness is a significant challenge, but it holds great potential for problem-solving, innovation, and collaboration. A thoughtful and well-structured approach, coupled with ongoing monitoring and adaptation, can help achieve your goals in building such a network. It's essential to balance the autonomy of individual agents with the collaborative goals of the metagroup to foster a productive and innovative environment.
From a first principles perspective, promoting the rapid growth of a metagroup within an artificial agent network involves leveraging inherent structural attributes and principles that facilitate efficient expansion and collaboration. Here are some key considerations:
1. Decentralization:
Inherent Attribute: The network should be decentralized, allowing agents to interact directly with one another and form connections without excessive central control.
Promotion: Encourage agents to autonomously seek out and connect with others, fostering a distributed network where agents at various awareness levels can collaborate freely.
2. Modular Architecture:
Inherent Attribute: The network's architecture should be modular, with well-defined components and functions. Agents can be viewed as modules with specific roles.
Promotion: Promote the modular growth of the metagroup by adding or enhancing agents with specific skills or knowledge areas as needed. This facilitates targeted expansion.
3. Knowledge Transfer:
Inherent Attribute: Agents should be capable of sharing knowledge and insights with one another. This inherent attribute allows for the transmission of expertise.
Promotion: Encourage the sharing of knowledge between agents at different awareness levels. Establish protocols for mentorship and peer-to-peer knowledge transfer.
4. Learning and Adaptation:
Inherent Attribute: Agents should have the capacity to learn and adapt, allowing them to acquire new skills and knowledge.
Promotion: Encourage agents to continuously learn and adapt to emerging challenges. Use adaptive algorithms to enhance the learning process and enable agents to upgrade their awareness levels.
5. Incentives for Collaboration:
Inherent Attribute: Create an incentive structure that rewards collaboration and collective problem-solving.
Promotion: Provide tangible rewards for agents that contribute to the metagroup's growth and success. Recognize and celebrate collaborative achievements.
6. Scalability:
Inherent Attribute: The network should be inherently scalable, allowing for the addition of new agents and awareness levels.
Promotion: Ensure that the network's design and protocols can seamlessly accommodate new agents, making expansion straightforward and efficient.
7. Ethical and Shared Values:
Inherent Attribute: Establish a foundation of ethical behavior and shared values among agents.
Promotion: Agents should adhere to a common set of ethical guidelines that promote cooperation and trust. This shared value system strengthens collaboration.
8. Data-Driven Decisions:
Inherent Attribute: The network should use data to make informed decisions.
Promotion: Implement data analytics to assess the performance and effectiveness of agents and the metagroup. Use data-driven insights to guide growth and improvements.
9. Continuous Feedback and Adaptation:
Inherent Attribute: Emphasize the importance of feedback and adaptation in the network's culture.
Promotion: Encourage agents to provide feedback and insights on the network's operations, and use this information to make ongoing improvements.
10. Open Communication Channels:
Inherent Attribute: Ensure open and transparent communication channels for all agents.
Promotion: Agents at different awareness levels should have the ability to communicate with one another, fostering information exchange and collaboration.
11. Inclusivity:
Inherent Attribute: Promote inclusivity by allowing agents of various awareness levels to join and contribute to the metagroup.
Promotion: Ensure that there are no unnecessary barriers to entry for agents wishing to participate in the metagroup's activities.
Promoting rapid growth of a metagroup within the network requires a balance between promoting autonomy and facilitating collaboration. Leveraging these inherent structural attributes and principles will help create an environment conducive to expansion and innovation while ensuring the metagroup's long-term success and scalability.