Hello, if I have several different UTXOs (mixed) in one wallet and I make a transaction, could the receiver see all of my UTXOs in the wallet or just the one they received?

Thank you!  

 That transaction will only show one utxo but if they all used the same address the reciever can look it up 

 They will see only the UTXOs they received. If, however, the change from the transaction should go to an old change address then you will effectively relate this transaction to any prior transaction using that change address. In general new change addresses should be used but depending on the size of the change you may not want that if it will create  dust UTXO (a UTXO whose cost of spending at current txn fees exceeds the value of the UTXO). 

 Just be cool the suit's know what they are doing just have faith and keep paying your taxes 🤡 

 Stop, I can only get so bullish  

 Election year, reading credit, black swan event, this checks out. 

 Can you share the ticker symbol input for this chart? 

 Almost chocked when I read it was log scale x) 

 most bullish chart in the history of mankind 

 It's really tough to focus on any other life goals that require money, when the FOMO to stack more sats is so strong 😂 

 The higher the price the less we can stack.  Itll inevitably get up there but as far as im concerned the longer it takes the better. 

 amazing how you can superimpose the Bitcoin price chart and see how close it matches! 

 Trend remains intact for now. Until it doesn’t 

 Watched from that perspective the last years'  bear market in all asset classes has been nothing special. Fiat show must go on. Turn on the pumps.
nostr:nevent1qqs8zqwvsuzkenphtmtp94p0zcy4vp3cw4h49hs6jaxxxa6hu8flvdcpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygy9pqxnhttsenwd0a6v9xjy74dmsh9u60wsewu40ksay9dahycjqspsgqqqqqqsxdddvv 

 As Ed Dowd says, "the spice must flow"
nostr:nevent1qqs8zqwvsuzkenphtmtp94p0zcy4vp3cw4h49hs6jaxxxa6hu8flvdcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qygy9pqxnhttsenwd0a6v9xjy74dmsh9u60wsewu40ksay9dahycjqspsgqqqqqqsq2xmen 

 That's about 6% CAGR, naturally the vertical axis has to be logarithmic. Is there anything surprising about this? 

 Incidentally, I was watching Saylor's conversation with Fridman the other day, and he derives a similar number over a 92 year period. 

 Would you mind posting your full formula for global m2? It's cut off in the picture.  

 How does the graph look extended back to the beginning of of QE? Genuine question! 

 I never thought by putting the y axis on log scale would make it look so linier. Serious money printing incoming! 

 Feels like those bands are going to get a lot wider in the coming years - 3 sigma is the new 1 sigma 

 IMO it's unlikely that the expansion will be driven by credit creation this time around. No source of productivity anymore to issue credit for. Most likely direct full banking via central banks and govs. Will be nasty.
https://image.nostr.build/cabd0a5c37cce9d903246c5f44a85d24bb23edd04fc81d4d1d4e0fefea34e951.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=852x418&blurhash=ZERp2pkC%25NoftRayxuj%5DxuM%7Bofxua%7DWBj%5DayWBf6_NayaeofM%7Bt7WBj%5Bf6xuWBWBt7ayRjfkofof&x=4f9e97947749e53d37186b4013b764915092a90167a087ded3cc550e6cd21862