doesn't jive with the idiotic idea that carbon came from where?

outer space? what the fuck

no, obviously it was encapsulated into the crust and substance of the planet and it separates out like everything, silica, magnesium, iron, etc etc etc

so many things about current geological/climatological "Science :trademark:" is so obviously half baked and more retarded than fairy stories 

 carbon comes from my mouth       lol   hey m 

 Yes, carbon comes from Helium burning stars, specifically supergiants that have burnt away most of their hydrogen. 

 Carbon was created by God when He created the Earth before the stars. 

 oil pools like water/ just a fact that i've seen but does it mean    (0_O))))) reverb 

 well, two things - there is a geologist from western australia who did a presentation i saw a few years back where he showed that by taking all the estimated ages of the parts of the earth, and deleting them to show the reversed process of expansion, it all very neatly returns to an original state where there was no oceans, according to their rock age estimates the youngest of the surface is is 200MM years... well, you know, idk how they estimate that if it's C14 related

anyhow, the point is, if the earth is expanding, then we also know already that it's not just dust falling on us from space, that isn't enough to explain this rate of mass accumulation

what would explain it, however, is a superconductive supercritical iron magnetic core in which the gravity is so intense that time slows down to such a speed that matter inside is able to stabilise, all squashed into the supercritical liquid but not liquid core, and new matter is constantly bubbling out from there

that would include C14 and all the things

also, the expanding earth could explain a lot more things and with the bogus guesses about time, maybe even the earth is actually that young... 

i don't really know at this point but i'm inclined to think that stuff like the rate of erosion of very large sandstone blocks would have to be the most accurate age estimation i have seen and i just saw it explained that there is megalithic sandstone structure, i forget where, Karnak, maybe, that has clearly lost 2' of its surface from erosion, which puts it at around minimum 12000 years old

the erosion could to have been much stronger than this, even a flood would not have made that much damage in the short time it runs for, though it would be one of the most erosive times it would have experienced, maybe it lost an inch from that, but you se what i mean?

and according to the egyptians writings, the people who built that stuff were "gods" in their words, and they also clearly had computers and robots, they left behind vases that were clearly machined by robots with higher precision than we can even measure at this point