The data is pretty clear that there has been a dramatic change in atmospheric composition and climate stability. That said, austerity and fine grained control is a solution that only benefits a small number of people. Moar energy and basic, loophole free regulation is the solution that benefits everyone. 

 Going from 0.02% to 0.04% co2 is not dramatic 

 Like going from 300 Kelvin to 600 Kelvin I'm sure. We can agree to disagree on that half: I think we both agree that more energy and less control is the better future.