Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
AVERAGE_GARY | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 An inscription filled chain is perfectly valid by consensus rules.
▲ ▼
leohaf | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 This argument again and again...

The 2010 bug with 93 billion BTC was also valid...
▲ ▼
AVERAGE_GARY | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 That’s a bug. Arbitrary data on the blockchain has been around for a long long time.
▲ ▼
leohaf | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 It’s not because a bug has been there for a long time that it should not be fixed.
▲ ▼
AVERAGE_GARY | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Have fun stopping BitVM too then. Is that a bug? It will enable similar things to inscriptions.
▲ ▼
leohaf | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 If someone makes a patch for then yes I would standardizes bitvm as well.