Oddbean new post about | logout
 @b05df304 @🌲-alist @e7f7ab20 

Civilizations fighting each other has always occurred, I agree, human using others for slaves or free labor, has occurred in many civilizations, I agree. But Human considering others as subhuman or even another race, this is white European Elite Ideology.  

> The northern africans enslaved white people... we had to go to war to stop them from enslaving whites....

Bullshit, how much many of "white slave" descendant live in North Africa right now? Compare that of black slaves descendant that live in US or European colonies.

They were act of ship piracy, yes! The European were the ones taking north African for slaves thought out history from the Roman Empire to recent European colonization of North Africa. 

>Central africans enslaved their own people for sale to salve traders, so they had a hand in their own slavery, and sometimes even owned their own slaves within tribes.

The slave trade has been forced to many African nations back then as they are now force to sell their natural resources for cheap. 

>There is no shortage of examples of every race, any race, enslaving almost any other... this includes white people on both sides of slavery throughout history.

Classic history whitewash to justify the massive industrial scale of the European international slave trade. 

I just want to add that the majority of white European are the victim of the white European Elite ideology, through out history i.e (WWI, WWII) and up to this day. 
 @0134ce10  But Human considering others as subhuman or even another race, this is white European Elite Ideology.

Not really,  racial superiority is a concept that is as old as time.  Bullshit, how much many of “white slave” descendant live in North Africa right now? Compare that of black slaves descendant that live in US or European colonies.

What? You say its bullshit and then argue against something no one said… We said northern africa enslaved whites and we had to go to war to get them to stop… this is true… what does that have to do with the number that survived or live there today? I mean I made no assertions about that so no matter what the answer, how does that relate to if what I said was bullshit or not?  They were act of ship piracy, yes! The European were the ones taking north African for slaves thought out history from the Roman Empire to recent European colonization of North Africa.

I mean the ship piracy certainly was a source of the slavery industry in norther africa… but white slaves were very much documented and a historical fact fromt he period.  The slave trade has been forced to many African nations back then as they are now force to sell their natural resources for cheap.

Forced is a matter of opinion… These were wholly native blacks operating it locally, capturing, enslaving and selling other blacks. Obviously whites did come and buy those blacks, and that money is what encouraged the trade. But when those whites set off and sailed again those black people that remained, free black people, kept the business going until the next ship arrived.  Classic history whitewash to justify the massive industrial scale of the European international slave trade.

I mean if you want to call actual historic facts white washing… go ahead… everything I said was true.

I notice again you talk about scale, and thats valid, at no point did I suggest the less populace nations with fewer resources were able to scale at anywhere near white nations… probably not… but also largely irrelevant. Per capita it was more or less the same, whites arent guilty just for being more industrial or there being more of them.

@🌲-alist @e7f7ab20 
 @b05df304 @🌲-alist @e7f7ab20

We can argue back and forth all day about history.  notice again you talk about scale, and thats valid, at no point did I suggest the less populace nations with fewer resources were able to scale at anywhere near white nations… probably not… but also largely irrelevant. Per capita it was more or less the same, whites arent guilty just for being more industrial or there being more of them.

We can agree that scale matter a lot, whether in terms of slave trade impact on the European global dominance with a large network of slave colonies, or recent massive scale of use fossil fuels, the wars to control that trade and it’s impact on the planet in terms of climate change.

It seems like that the white European Elite greed has no limit until the destruction of the planet. Ether by nukes or climate change. 
 @0134ce10  We can argue back and forth all day about history.

We can. And considering the gross misrepresentation of history you seem to be selling, I suspect we probably should.  We can agree that scale matter a lot, whether in terms of slave trade impact on the European global dominance with a large network of slave colonies, or recent massive scale of use fossil fuels, the wars to control that trade and it’s impact on the planet in terms of climate change.

Scale matters in terms of effect, sure, but lets go back to your original claim being debunked:  But Human considering others as subhuman or even another race, this is white European Elite Ideology.

The truth of this statement has nothing to do with scale. So while scale may “matter a lot” due to societal impact (and it does) that still has no relevance to the argument in debate at the moment.

@🌲-alist @e7f7ab20 
 @b05df304  But Human considering others as subhuman or even another race, this is white European Elite Ideology.  The truth of this statement has nothing to do with scale. So while scale may “matter a lot” due to societal impact (and it does) that still has no relevance to the argument in debate at the moment.

I still stand with that statement, because I can bring you many quotes from so many prominent white European Elite(Philosophers, politicians, rules, writer, etc) that make claim.

I challenge you bring quotes from  prominent Elite from North Africa, middle eat, south America, that make that claim.

I truly believe that the master race Ideology is purely European origin.

Note:(Ideologies tend to spread, so other nations i.e Japan embracing that ideology does’t make it less European).

@🌲-alist @e7f7ab20 
   I still stand with that statement, because I can bring you many quotes from so many prominent white European Elite(Philosophers, politicians, rules, writer, etc) that make claim.

You dont see the fallacy of logic there?

You are claiming “Only X does Y”.. and then go on to effectively say “I can prove it by giving examples of X doing Y”… That would only prove that X does Y, it is the “only” part you need to prove.

So if for every single one of your examples of a white man treating a non-white as lesser, if I could match each one with a historic example of a non-white person doing that to another, then do we agree you’d be wrong? If you dont agree then do you see why your approach here  doesnt prove your point?  I challenge you bring quotes from  prominent Elite from North Africa, middle eat, south America, that make that claim.

I’d be happy to, but before I waste my energy what is the exact number of prominent non-white people doing this do I need to actually quote for you before you agree I have proven you wrong? I mean, I need to know what the rules are if you wanna go this route.  Note:(Ideologies tend to spread, so other nations i.e Japan embracing that ideology does’t make it less European).

Well at least you moved the goal post before I bothered… So now your saying no matter how many quotes I give you of elite non-whites looking down on other races you can always play the “well the idea originated from a white guy at some point” game and invalidate those quotes arbitrarily? I hope your seeing your biases now and how you even set the rules up knowing you will be proven wrong and giving yourself a backdoor… Because even actual evidence now you can just hand wave away with no proof.