This is great! going to try it also. @fiatjaf I see the connection string is a bit different than I remember when integrating Pablo’s version, does it work the same or is this a different spec?
It's the same. We must agree on a connection string. I think people like the "bunker://" notation, so we must convince @PABLOF7z to implement it. But we should also implement the NIP-05 custodial flow he is working on. I am not sure what are the necessary changes, but should be minimal.