"In the future not everyone will have the right to use layer 1"

Brilliant. The resounding success of "sound money" - accessible to the privileged alone, afforded none of the benefits of security as a tradeoff of percieved anonymity.

Have you ever run a lightning node?

"With bitcoin L1 you can use coinjoins and get the same or more privacy than with Monero."

Samurai says hi. Coinjoins will be eliminated in the process, they already are working on getting rid of them and jailing anyone working on them.

You seem to spend a lot of time attacking Monero. Why are you so concerned about it if it's not scalable, not decentralized and keeps losing value to Bitcoin?

Do you think this is an effective strategy to win over people who value privacy as a defence mechanism against the state? 

 I don't care about Monero, it is the followers of Monero who have constantly attacked me and as I see where you're coming from I'll leave the conversation here. 

 You don't care about Monero and your name is cypherpunk, something is wrong here 

 Man, you are the ine cheering state attacks against Monero. 

 And by the way, you lack knowledge about scalability of blockchains to speak with the haughty tone you speak, ignorance is very bold.

https://primal.net/e/note12v95j76tde5a3uzve2mpdza07qd2e4m9jlet88ngg4zj0kzyuzns69ncdm 

 So you haven't run a Lightning node, have you?

Pretty ballsy speaking about something you don't seem to have experience with.

I'm being pretty candid in my arguments here. I didn't mention scalability. You are being short-sighted in an attempt to win an argument that doesn't really need to exist. Maximalism is toxic, be it monero or Bitcoin.

Stay humble or get wrecked. 

 Just wanted to say MimbleWimble and Nano are very scalable blockchains. So not all blockchains. Although some may disagree with the tradeoffs they make.