Oddbean new post about | logout
 My view is very simple: not your keys, not your bitcoin. Calling these e-cash tokens self custodial is the biggest cope I've seen.

If you keep up with @shocknet_justin and @Car you'll get a good idea of where I'm coming from. 
 Only one vocal person says its self-custodial. 😐

And he's wrong about it.  
 my stance on ecash is on the latest ep on SNL,  @dk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyCicFzd3SA&list=PLKnVil22cJNzDABNpAQ2JecRzU3SUtV8V

frankly I am tired of talking about it atp, let the builders build 
 Listening now. 🫡 
 @Car is the man.  
 Would love a journalistic dig into any funding origins.  
 Cool, I’ll catch up on this, Car, thanks! 
 its just one mans opinion, can change over time 
 great philosophy: form opinions, but be willing to change over time 
 also typical modern emasculated western male noncommittal conformist drivel.

the kind of shit that's safe to say at all of the "gatherings". 
 Strong opinion loosly held. 
 Hope @captain ☦️ compromised or @Car will discuss ecash and their concerns in public with me at Nashville. I am running the Bitcoin Veterans workshops and would be happy to have an open forum discussion. We can get as technical as you'd like.  
 not sure if i will be attending the conf but will be around nashville, will be throwing a private snl party and livestream 
 Thanks, I’m following both of them now, too.

I’ve always had the assumption that a payment for a good/service always has counter-party risk with whoever you’re exchanging with.

So I would never consider eCash self-custodial, but I’ve always thought of it more like a simplified UX involving an additional party for an already somewhat risky transaction.

You could give me 10,000 sats from cold storage and I might still run away with the coffee we had agreed I’d hand over in exchange. 
 This rationale highlights my issues with it

Custody of small amounts (credit) is inevitable in an economic sense, but ECash isn't additive to that at all, while ECashers position them as synonymous despite solving the wrong problems inhibiting broader adoption of Bitcoin as a MoE

It's not more programmable than any other database, it's actually much worse because of the the abstraction from the underlying asset

The privacy benefits are farcical, particularly in the context of small nodes, and treating it as a new payment spec is deleterious to interoperability

If the goal is to have shared friends and family nodes for Bitcoin as a MoE, then Lightning.Pub is superior to mints in every way 
 Sir please buy my NO-Cash Notekens